| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/29/2000 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | |
on behalf of George Payton Shanks
|
|
| 12/13/2001 | Response to Motion for Rehearing | |
Kenda Carolyn (Shanks) Teadway's Response to Motion for Rehearing
|
|
| 11/28/2001 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
response to rehearing due 12/13/01
|
|
| 11/21/2001 | Amicus Curiae Letter Received | |
on behalf of Harry L. Tindall, Harry L. Tindall, Tindall & Foster, 1300 Post O ak Blvd., Ste. 2200,Houston,TX77002,713-622-8733
|
|
| 11/16/2001 | Amicus Curiae Brief received | |
on behalf of Joseph W. McKnight, by Steven R. Brown, 3331 Ranch Road 12, STe. 101, San Marcos, TX 78666 512-392-6202
|
|
| 10/26/2001 | Motion for Rehearing | |
on behalf of George Payton Shanks
|
|
| 10/26/2001 | Motion for Rehearing forwarded | |
record remains in clerk's office
|
|
| 10/11/2001 | Petition for Review disposed | Denied |
Order withdrawn March 21, 2002.
|
|
| 10/10/2020 | Brief from database | |
Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
|
|
| 10/09/2020 | Brief from database | |
Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
|
|
| 10/08/2020 | Brief from database | |
Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
|
|
| 10/07/2020 | Brief from database | |
Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
|
|
| 10/06/2020 | Brief from database | |
Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
|
|
| 10/05/2020 | Brief from database | |
Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
|
|
| 08/23/2001 | Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. | Filing granted |
Respondent's motion to allow W. Dane Clay to appear pro hac vice & mo of Texas attorney request permission to allow Dane Clay to appear pro hac vice was gran
|
|
| 08/23/2001 | Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. | Filing granted |
Mr. Clay's supplemented motion to appear pro hac vice was granted.
|
|
| 08/21/2001 | Certification (various) in case received | |
Certificate of conference received 8-21-01
|
|
| 08/21/2001 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Called Mr. Clay requesting that he fax over the certificate of service for the supplement motion
|
|
| 08/20/2001 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Called Mr. W. Dane Clay requesting the cert. of conference he said that it was conferred with on first motion (the Texas atty conferred and it is not opposed
|
|
| 08/20/2001 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Called Mr. Birch's office requesting the $10 filing fee for pro hav vice motio n; will be fed exing the check
|
|
| 08/20/2001 | Supplement to Motion filed | |
Mr. W. Dane Clay's supplement to his motion to participate pro hav vice
|
|
| 08/15/2001 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
to W. Dane Clay re: deficiencies in motion for leave to appear pro hac vice. Faxed him info so he can supplement motion.
|
|
| 08/14/2003 | Case Stored | |
G02/25-B-1
|
|
| 08/12/2003 | Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the mandate date of a process | |
CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive mandate date.
|
|
| 08/12/2003 | Certified cys of cost bill sent to attys of record | |
Cost bill issued.
|
|
| 08/12/2003 | Mandate issued | |
Mandate issued.
|
|
| 08/10/2001 | Reply to Response | |
petitioner's reply brief on the merits
|
|
| 08/06/2002 | Additional cites or additional authorities | |
recent article from TX Bar Journal
|
|
| 08/03/2001 | Miscellaneous Motion | |
Mr. James Birch's motion for Mr. Clay to appear pro hav vice
|
|
| 08/03/2001 | Miscellaneous Motion | |
W. Dane Clay's motion to appear pro hac vice
|
|
| 07/31/2001 | Document received (See Remarks) | |
rec'd requested signature page for respondent's brief on the merits (12)
|
|
| 07/30/2001 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
requested signature page with Texas attorney; will overnight.
|
|
| 07/26/2001 | Brief on the Merits | |
respondent's brief on the merits
|
|
| 07/06/2001 | Brief on the Merits | |
Petitioner's brief on the merits
|
|
| 06/26/2003 | Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of record | Issued |
judgment issued
|
|
| 06/26/2003 | Opinion issued | Court of Appeals' judgment affirmed |
The Court affirmes the COA's judment (opinion by HON)
|
|
| 06/26/2003 | Order of the Court Issued | Court of Appeals Opinion ordered published |
The COA's opinion ordered published
|
|
| 06/20/2001 | Record Received (See Remarks) | |
Inventory in remarks section.
|
|
| 06/06/2001 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
petitioner/s brief on the merits is due 7-6-01; respondent/s brief on the merits is due 7-26-01; petitioner/s reply brief is due 8-10-01
|
|
| 06/06/2001 | Record Requested in Case | |
Left message and faxed Bonnie, 5th COA
|
|
| 06/01/2001 | Reply to Response | |
petitioner's reply
|
|
| 05/16/2001 | Response to Petition | |
On behalf of Kenda Carolyn (Shanks) Treadway
|
|
| 04/24/2002 | Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the submission date of a process | |
CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive submission info.
|
|
| 04/24/2002 | Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the submitted date of a process | |
CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive submitted date.
|
|
| 04/24/2002 | Oral argument | |
Argued for petitioners by Susan L. Hays & Richard N. Countiss; for respondents by Shawn Casey & W. Dane Clay (consolidated for OA w/01-0251).
|
|
| 04/18/2002 | Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. | Denied |
Jt/mo to align parties at counsel table & set order of argument is denied. The Court orders realignment of the parties in Cause No. 01-0251, f/argument only.
|
|
| 04/16/2001 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
response due Wednesday, 5/16/01
|
|
| 04/11/2002 | Miscellaneous Motion | |
Joint Motion to Align Parties are Counsel Table and Set Order of Argument
|
|
| 04/01/2002 | Call received | |
call from Cindy Herrera, will mail eBrief on 4/2/2002
|
|
| 04/01/2002 | Electronic copies of brief posted to website | |
Respondent's ebrief for thier brief on the merits EBRIEF 00132501
|
|
| 04/01/2002 | Electronic copies of brief posted to website | |
Pet's ebrief for their reply brief on the merits EBRIEF 00132503
|
|
| 04/01/2002 | Electronic copies of brief posted to website | |
Petitioner's ebrief for their brief on the merits EBRIEF 00132502
|
|
| 03/25/2002 | Corrected Notice sent to all counsel | |
Letter with corrected oral argument date sent.
|
|
| 03/21/2002 | Motion for Rehearing - Disposed | Filing granted |
CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive disposition info.
|
|
| 03/21/2002 | Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive disposition info.
|
|
| 03/21/2002 | Amount of time allotted for oral argument. | |
20 minutes per side; consolidated for oral argument with case # 01-0251.
|
|
| 03/21/2002 | Motion for Rehearing - Disposed | Filing granted |
|
|
| 03/21/2002 | Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
The Court grants petitioner's motion for rehearing and withdraws its order of October 11, 2001, denying the petition for review.
|
|
| 03/21/2002 | Previous Order of the Court withdrawn | |
The order dated October 11, 2001, denying petition for review is withdrawn.
|
|
| 03/21/2002 | Set for Submission | |
To be argued Wednesday, April 24, 2002.
|
|
| 03/20/2001 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 02/16/2001 | Appendix Filed | |
Appendix attached to petition for review
|
|
| 02/16/2001 | Petition for Review | |
On behalf George Payton Shanks
|
|
| 01/31/2001 | Petition due | |
petition for review is due 2-16-01
|
|
| 01/31/2001 | Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
second m/e/t to file petition for review is granted; petition is due 2-16-01
|
|
| 01/30/2001 | Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | |
on behalf of George Payton Shanks
|
|
| 01/03/2001 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
m/e/t to file petiiton for review is granted; petition is due February 1, 2001
|
|
| 01/03/2001 | Petition due | |
petition for review is due February 1, 2001
|
|