Supreme Court

Case: 02-0193    
02-0193
03/05/2002
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., RCW OF EDMOND, INC., RENAISSANCE WOMEN'S CENTER OF AUSTIN L.L.C., AND RENAISSANCE WOMEN'S CENTER OF AUSTIN, L.P. 
RENAISSANCE WOMEN'S GROUP, P.A. 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/12/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/11/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/06/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
05/09/2003Reply to ResponseRespondent Reply to letter brief filed on behalf of Renaissance Women's Center of Austin, L.L.C.
05/07/2003Letter brief Petitioner Letter brief on behalf of Universal, reply to letter brief filed by responden the physicians on May 5, 2003.
05/05/2003Response to PetitionRespondent Respondent's response to post-submission letter brief and questions posed by the court during argument
04/24/2003Post submission brief filedPetitioner Letter from petitioner answering a number of questions that were raised in oral argument
04/16/2003Exhibits in case/cause filedRespondent Exhibits for oral argument on behalf of Renaissance Women's Group, P.A.
04/16/2003Exhibits in case/cause filedPetitioner Original and 11
11/12/2002Reply BriefPetitioner Petitioner's reply brief on the merits
10/28/2002Brief on the MeritsRespondent Respondents' brief on the merits+
09/30/2002Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Brief on the merits on behalf of petitioner, Universal Health Services, Inc.
08/16/2002Reply to ResponsePetitioner Petitioner's sur-reply to respondent's reply to reply to response to petition
08/12/2002Response to PetitionRespondent Respondents' reply to petitioners' reply to response to petition
07/25/2002Reply to ResponsePetitioner Filed on behalf of Universal Health Services, Inc. et al,(1)extra copy no SASE Reply to Response to Pet for Review
07/11/2002Response to PetitionRespondent On behalf of Margaret Thompson, MD et al
04/09/2002Appendix FiledPetitioner appendix attached
04/09/2002Petition for ReviewPetitioner on behalf of Universal Health Services, Inc., et al
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
11/21/2003Case Stored  G02/25-G-3  (8 folders)
11/17/2003Mandate issued  Mandate and costbill issued.
11/12/2002Reply Brief  Petitioner's reply brief on the merits
10/28/2002Brief on the Merits  Respondents' brief on the merits+
10/12/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/11/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/06/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/04/2002Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Resp/s brief due 10/28/02.  Pet/s reply brief due 11/12/02. Briefs due n/l/t 5:00 pm.  Mailbox rule d/n/a.
10/04/2002Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Respondent's m/e/t to file brief on the merits
09/30/2003Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed & judgment rendered
09/30/2002Brief on the Merits  Brief on the merits on behalf of petitioner, Universal Health Services, Inc.
09/24/2002Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Pet/s brief due 9-30-02, Resp/s br due 10-21-02, Pet/s reply brief due 11-5-02 Briefs due n/l/t 5:00 pm.  Mailbox rule d/n/a.
09/23/2002Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Petitioner's m/e/t to file brief on the merits
08/26/2002Record Received (See Remarks)  Inventory in remarks
08/23/2002Brief on the Merits Ordered  Pet/s brief on the merits is due 09-23-02, resp br is due 10-14-02, pet/s repl y is due 10-29-02: all br/s due n/l/t 5:00 pm., mlbx rule d/n/a
08/23/2002Record Requested in Case  Called and faxed the 3rd CA - spoke to Courtland Crocker
08/21/2002M/L/F Misc Mo DispFiling granted Petitioners m/l/f surreply to response was granted, pettiioners surreply was filed 08-16-02
08/16/2002Motion for leave to file miscellaneous motion  Petitioner's m/l/f surreply to respondent's reply
08/16/2002Reply to Response  Petitioner's sur-reply to respondent's reply to reply to response to petition
08/14/2002M/L/F Misc Mo DispFiling granted Respondents' m/l/f to file reply to petitioners' reply has been granted; the reply was filed 08-12-02
08/12/2002Motion for leave to file miscellaneous motion  Respondent's, Universal Health Services, Inc. et al. m/l/f reply to pet/s reply to response to petition for review
08/12/2002Response to Petition  Respondents' reply to petitioners' reply to response to petition
07/25/2002Reply to Response  Filed on behalf of Universal Health Services, Inc. et al,(1)extra copy no SASE Reply to Response to Pet for Review
07/11/2002Response to Petition  On behalf of Margaret Thompson, MD et al
06/11/2002Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Response is due n/l/t 5:00 pm., 07-11-02, mlx rule d/n/a
05/14/2002Case forwarded to Court 
05/09/2003Reply to Response  Reply to letter brief filed on behalf of Renaissance Women's Center of Austin, L.L.C.
05/07/2003Letter brief   Letter brief on behalf of Universal, reply to letter brief filed by responden the physicians on May 5, 2003.
05/05/2003Response to Petition  Respondent's response to post-submission letter brief and questions posed by the court during argument
04/24/2003Post submission brief filed  Letter from petitioner answering a number of questions that were raised in oral argument
04/16/2003Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the submitted date of a process  CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive submitted date.
04/16/2003Exhibits in case/cause filed  Exhibits for oral argument on behalf of Renaissance Women's Group, P.A.
04/16/2003Exhibits in case/cause filed  Original and 11
04/16/2003Oral argument   Argued for petitioners by Mr. Douglas W. Alexander; argued for respondent by Mr. Barry F. McNeil.
04/15/2003Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks.Filing granted Respondent's motion to allow additional counsel to sit at counsel table is gra nted.
04/15/2003Phone call from Clerk's Office  Called both sides to inform counsel that the motion resp filed for additional counsel to sit at counsel table is granted
04/11/2003Miscellaneous Motion  Respondent's motion to allow additional counsel to sit at counsel table
04/09/2002Appendix Filed  appendix attached
04/09/2002Petition for Review  on behalf of Universal Health Services, Inc., et al
03/18/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Respondent's ebrief for their response brief on the merits EBRIEF 02019303
03/13/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Petitioner's ebrief for their brief on the merits EBRIEF 02019301
03/13/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Petitioner's ebrief for their reply brief EBRIEF 02019302
03/06/2003Petition for Review disposedFiling granted CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive disposition info.
03/06/2003Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the submission date of a process  CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive submission info.
03/06/2003Amount of time allotted for oral argument.  20 minutes per side.
03/06/2003Petition for Review disposedFiling granted
03/06/2003Set for Submission  To be argued Wednesday, April 16, 2003.
03/06/2002Motion to Expedite disposedFiling granted Petitioner's motion for expedited consideration was granted
03/06/2002Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petitioner's m/e/t to file petition for review was granted until 04-08-02; pet ition is due 04-08-02
03/06/2002Petition due  Petition is due 04-08-02
03/05/2002Motion to Expedite  Petitioners' Mo/Expedite 53.7 (F) Motion
03/05/2002Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  On behalf of Universal Health Services, Inc., et al.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
11/21/2003Case StoredCase stored.G02/25-G-3 (8 folders)
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
NEYMAN, M.D., SHERRYOther interested party Mr. R. James George Jr.
RENAISSANCE WOMEN'S GROUP, P.ARespondentMr. James A. Hemphill
Ms. Nina Cortell
Mr. Charles Orr
Mr. R. James George Jr.
Mr. W Amon Burton
Mr. Barry F. McNeil
Mr. Patrick Lawrence Reznik
RENAISSANCE WOMEN'S CENTER OFPetitionerMr. Paul Denton Trahan
Ms. Mary S. Dietz
Mr. Steve Selby
Honorable J. Woodfin 'Woodie' Jones
Mr. Douglas Alexander
UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INCPetitionerMr. Roy Q. Minton
LITZINGER, M.D., LINDAOther interested party Mr. R. James George Jr.
DARBY, M.D., DARBYOther interested party Mr. R. James George Jr.
THOMPSON, M.D., MARGARETOther interested party Mr. R. James George Jr.
MERRITT, M.D., LAURAOther interested party Mr. R. James George Jr.
COLLINS, M.D., MELANIEOther interested party Mr. R. James George Jr.
RCW OF EDMOND, INC.PetitionerMs. Marcy Hogan Greer
HURLEY, M.D., DONNAOther interested party Mr. R. James George Jr.
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed [duplicate 3] 
63 SW3d 537, 11-29-01 
3rd Court of Appeals 
Honorable BEA ANN SMITH 
Trial Court Information
345th District Court 
Travis 
Honorable Paul R. Davis 
99-14404