Supreme Court

Case: 02-0988    
02-0988
10/23/2002
Second Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION 
LAKESHORE UTILITY COMPANY, INC., SENTRY TITLE COMPANY, INC., ALAN D. WHATLEY, AND THELMA J. WHATLEY 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/16/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/15/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/14/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/13/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/12/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/11/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/06/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
05/03/2005Motion for RehearingPetitioner's motion for rehearing of cause filed Petitioner, Lakeshore Utility Company's motion for rehearing. (seq#1)
11/19/2003Exhibits in case/cause filedRespondent Commission's bench book oral argument Nov. 19, 2003, Seq. #2
07/07/2003Reply BriefPetitioner commission's reply to Lakeshore's response briefSequence #: 02
07/07/2003Reply BriefPetitioner Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc.'s reply briefSequence #: 01
06/19/2003Appendix FiledRespondent appendix to Commission's response briefSequence #: 02
06/19/2003Brief on the MeritsRespondent Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., Sentry Title Company, Inc., Alan D. Whatley, and Thelma J. Whatley's response briefSequence #: 01
06/19/2003Brief on the MeritsRespondent Commission's response briefSequence #: 02
05/30/2003Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner, Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission brief on the meritsSequence #: 02
05/29/2003Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner, Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., ET AL. brief on the meritsSequence #: 01
03/25/2003Reply to ResponsePetitioner Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission reply to Lakeshore's response to TNRCC's pet. for reviewSequence #: 02
03/12/2003Appendix FiledRespondent appendix to response to pet. for reviewSequence #: 02
03/12/2003Response to PetitionRespondent Response on behalf of Texas Natural Resource Conservation CommissionSequence #: 02
03/10/2003Response to PetitionRespondent on behalf of Lakeshore Utility CompanySequence #: 01
01/10/2003Appendix FiledPetitioner appendix attached to petitionSequence #: 01
01/10/2003Petition for ReviewPetitioner On behalf of Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., ET AL.Sequence #: 01
12/12/2002Appendix FiledPetitioner appendix (12)Sequence #: 02
12/12/2002Petition for ReviewPetitioner On behalf of Texas Natural Resource Conservation CommissionSequence #: 02
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/12/2002Appendix Filed  appendix (12)Sequence #: 02
12/12/2002Petition for Review  On behalf of Texas Natural Resource Conservation CommissionSequence #: 02
11/19/2003Oral argument   Argued on behalf of petitioner 1 by Steve Dillawn; argued on behalf of respondent 2 Linda B. Secord.
11/19/2003Oral argument   Argued on behalf of petitioner 1 by Steve Dillawn; argued on behalf of respondent 2 Linda B. Secord.
11/19/2003Exhibits in case/cause filed  Commission's bench book oral argument Nov. 19, 2003, Seq. #2
10/25/2002Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Joint m/e/t to file petition was granted until December 12, 2002. Petitions due December 12, 2002.Sequence #: 01
10/23/2002Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive begin date.
10/23/2002Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  On behalf of Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc. ET AL.Sequence #: 01
10/16/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/15/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/14/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/13/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/12/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/11/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/06/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
09/11/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Lakeshore's ebrief for their reply brief on the merits EBRIEF 02098805Sequence #: 01
09/11/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Lakeshore's ebrief for their response brief EBRIEF 02098806Sequence #: 01
09/11/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Lakeshore Utility's ebrief for their pet brief on the merits EBRIEF 02098804Sequence #: 01
09/09/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Commission's ebrief for their reply brief EBRIEF 02098803Sequence #: 02
09/09/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Commission's ebrief for their response brief EBRIEF 02098802Sequence #: 02
09/08/2003Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Commission's ebrief for their brief on the merits EBRIEF 02098801Sequence #: 02
08/28/2003Petition for Review disposedFiling granted CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive disposition info.
08/28/2003Petition for Review disposedFiling granted CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive disposition info.
08/28/2003Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the submission date of a process  CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive submission info.
08/28/2003Created for Data Conversion -- an event inserted to correspond to the submission date of a process  CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive submission info.
08/28/2003Petition for Review disposedFiling granted CONVERSION EVENT: auto-inserted to match archive begin date.
08/28/2003Amount of time allotted for oral argument.  20 minutes per side.
08/28/2003Petition for Review disposedFiling granted On behalf of Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission; Justice Enoch not sitting.Sequence #: 02
08/28/2003Petition for Review disposedFiling granted On behalf of Lakeshore Utility Co., Inc., et al.; Justice Enoch not sitting.Sequence #: 01
08/28/2003Set for Submission  To be argued Wed., November 19, 2003.
07/08/2005Case Stored  G02/13-A-2
07/07/2003Reply Brief  Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc.'s reply briefSequence #: 01
07/07/2003Reply Brief  commission's reply to Lakeshore's response briefSequence #: 02
07/05/2005Mandate issued  Mandate and cost bill issued.
06/24/2005Motion for Rehearing - DisposedDenied
06/19/2003Appendix Filed  appendix to Commission's response briefSequence #: 02
06/19/2003Brief on the Merits  Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., Sentry Title Company, Inc., Alan D. Whatley, and Thelma J. Whatley's response briefSequence #: 01
06/19/2003Brief on the Merits  Commission's response briefSequence #: 02
05/30/2003Brief on the Merits  Petitioner, Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission brief on the meritsSequence #: 02
05/29/2003Brief on the Merits  Petitioner, Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., ET AL. brief on the meritsSequence #: 01
05/29/2003Notice from Counsel of a change in address  Notice of Change of Address of Steve Dillawn, atty. for petitioners
05/06/2005Response Waiver filed  On behalf of The Texas Natural Resource Conversation.  Also wanted Court to know that they did not receive a copy of the m/e/t or mo/re and that they oppose the m/e/t.  Neither motion contained a cert of conf as required. (seq#2)
05/04/2005Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposedFiling granted Pet Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc's m/e/t to file motion for rehearing granted.  Pet motion for rehearing was due and filed May 3, 2005.
05/03/2005Case forwarded to Court 
05/03/2005Motion for Rehearing  Petitioner, Lakeshore Utility Company's motion for rehearing. (seq#1)
05/03/2005Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing  Petitioners' Lake Shore Utility Co. Inc's m/e/t to file mo/re. (seq#1)
05/01/2003Record Received (See Remarks)  Inventory in remarks
05/01/2003Record Requested in Case  Emailed Courtland @ 3rd CA
04/30/2003Brief on the Merits Ordered  Pet/s br due 05-30-03, resp br due 06-19-03, reply br due 07-07-03
04/08/2005Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
04/08/2005Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part
04/08/2005Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part
03/25/2003Reply to Response  Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission reply to Lakeshore's response to TNRCC's pet. for reviewSequence #: 02
03/12/2003Appendix Filed  appendix to response to pet. for reviewSequence #: 02
03/12/2003Response to Petition  Response on behalf of Texas Natural Resource Conservation CommissionSequence #: 02
03/10/2003Response to Petition  on behalf of Lakeshore Utility CompanySequence #: 01
02/10/2003Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  see calendar, Response due: March 12, 2003
01/14/2003Case forwarded to Court 
01/10/2003Appendix Filed  appendix attached to petitionSequence #: 01
01/10/2003Petition for Review  On behalf of Lakeshore Utility Company, Inc., ET AL.Sequence #: 01
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
07/08/2005Case StoredCase stored.G02/13-A-2
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
WHATLEY, THELMAPetitionerMr. George Breck Harrison
LAKESHORE UTILITY COMPANY, INCPetitionerMr. J. Stephen Dillawn
LAKESHORE UTILITY COMPANYPetitionerMr. Philip Dale Mockford
WHATLEY, ALAN D.PetitionerMr. J. Albert Kroemer
SENTRY TITLE COMPANY, INC.PetitionerMr. Leonard H. Dougal
TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVRespondentMr. Howard G. Baldwin
Ms. Jane Elizabeth Atwood
Mr. Barry Ross McBee
Mr. Jeffrey S. Boyd
Mr. Gregory Abbott
Ms. Linda B. Secord
Ms. Karen Watson Kornell
Court of Appeals Information:
AFFIRM/REVERSE/REMAND 
92 SW3d 556, 09-12-02 
3rd Court of Appeals 
 
Trial Court Information
299th District Court 
Travis 
Honorable Paul R. Davis 
481,027