Supreme Court

Case: 03-0547    
03-0547
06/18/2003
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
BMG DIRECT MARKETING, INC. 
PATRICK PEAKE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
06/02/2004Post submission brief filedRespondent Post submission letter brief filed on behalf of Patrick Peake in regard to the reversal of one of the authorities relied upon in briefing.  
02/26/2004Post submission brief filedRespondent Post submission letter brief responding to letter brief filed on 2-23-04, filed on behalf of Patrick Peake  (1 extra copy, no sase)
02/23/2004Letter brief Petitioner on behalf of BMG Direct Marketing, Inc., post-argument letter to clarify its response to a question posed by the Court
10/30/2003Reply BriefPetitioner Petitioner's reply to respondents' response to petitioner's brief on the merits
10/15/2003Brief on the MeritsRespondent Respondent's response to BMG's brief on the merits, extra copy in control folder
09/25/2003Brief on the MeritsPetitioner BMG Direct Marketing, Inc's brief on the merits
08/04/2003Reply to ResponsePetitioner petitioner's reply to respondents' response to pet. for review
07/30/2003Response to PetitionRespondent Response to petition for review filed on behalf of Patrick Peake ET AL.
06/18/2003Appendix FiledPetitioner appendix attached
06/18/2003Petition for ReviewPetitioner on behalf of BMG Direct Marketing, Inc.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
11/28/2005Description of document returned to Supreme Court  from attorneys Gregory A. Clarick and Steven M. Hayes.  Addresses updated in case management, and opinions resent.
11/18/2005Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
11/18/2005Concurring Opinion issued.Issued
11/18/2005Concurring Opinion issued.Issued
11/18/2005Opinion issuedjudgments below reversed/remanded tc f/settlement
10/30/2003Reply Brief  Petitioner's reply to respondents' response to petitioner's brief on the merits
10/15/2003Brief on the Merits  Respondent's response to BMG's brief on the merits, extra copy in control folder
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
09/25/2003Brief on the Merits  BMG Direct Marketing, Inc's brief on the merits
09/15/2003Record Received (See Remarks)  Inventory in remarks
09/02/2003Record Requested in Case  Emailed Carol Germann @ 9th CA
08/26/2003Brief on the Merits Ordered  Pet/s br due 09-25-03, resp/s br is due 10-15-03, pet/s reply br due 10-30-03. Brs due n/l/t 5:00 pm, mlbx rule d/n/a.
08/04/2003Reply to Response  petitioner's reply to respondents' response to pet. for review
07/30/2003Response to Petition  Response to petition for review filed on behalf of Patrick Peake ET AL.
06/30/2003Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  requested response is due n/l/t 5:00 pm., 07-30-03 mlxb rule d/n/a
06/24/2003Case forwarded to Court 
06/23/2003Response Waiver filed  on behalf of Patrick Peake
06/18/2003Appendix Filed  appendix attached
06/18/2003Petition for Review  on behalf of BMG Direct Marketing, Inc.
06/02/2004Post submission brief filed  Post submission letter brief filed on behalf of Patrick Peake in regard to the reversal of one of the authorities relied upon in briefing.  
02/26/2004Post submission brief filed  Post submission letter brief responding to letter brief filed on 2-23-04, filed on behalf of Patrick Peake  (1 extra copy, no sase)
02/23/2004Letter brief   on behalf of BMG Direct Marketing, Inc., post-argument letter to clarify its response to a question posed by the Court
02/18/2004Oral argument   Argued on behalf of petitioner by Lynne Liberato;  argued on behalf of respondents by Bruce b. Kemp.
02/11/2004Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Petitioner's ebrief for reply brief on the merits, EBRIEF# 03054703
02/11/2004Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Petitioner's ebrief on the merits for brief on the merits, EBRIEF# 03054702
02/04/2004Electronic copies of brief posted to website  Respondent's ebrief for response brief, EBRIEF #03054701
01/30/2004Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument To be argued 02-18-04
01/30/2004Petition for Review grantedFiling granted
01/30/2004Petition for Review disposedFiling granted To be argued 02-18-04
01/13/2006Case Stored  G02/12-B-2
01/09/2006Mandate issued  Mandate and cost bill issued.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
01/13/2006Case StoredCase stored.G02/12-B-2
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
PEAKE, PATRICKRespondentMr. Timothy W. Ferguson
Mr. Bruce B. Kemp
Mr. Christopher A. Kesler
BMG DIRECT MARKETING, INC.PetitionerMs. Lynne Liberato
Mr. Gregory A. Clarick
Ms. Alene Ross 'Allie' Levy
Mr. Steven M. Hayes
Ms. Patricia L. Casey
Mr. Mark R. Trachtenberg
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed [duplicate 3] 
175 SW3d 267, 05-01-03 
9th Court of Appeals 
Honorable DON BURGESS 
Trial Court Information
60th District Court 
Jefferson 
Honorable James Gary Sanderson 
B-167,222