Supreme Court

Case: 03-0948    
03-0948
10/16/2003
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
AT&T CORPORATION AND AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC. 
CHARLES BRYCELAND, KARL D. BRAWNER, AND WILLIAM CARL CHRISTENSEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/12/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/11/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
11/23/2004Reply to ResponsePetitioner Petitioners' reply in support of rehearing.  On behalf of AT&T Corp and ST&T Wireless Services, Inc.
11/18/2004Response to Motion for RehearingRespondent Response in opposition to motion for rehearing filed on behalf of Charles Bryceland et al.
10/12/2004Motion for RehearingRehearing filed in Petition for Review On behalf of AT&T Corp and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
05/13/2004Amended Brief filedPetitioner Petitioner amended reply brief on the merits
05/11/2004Reply BriefPetitioner Petitioners' brief in reply
04/26/2004Brief on the MeritsRespondent Respondents' brief on the merits
04/09/2004Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Brief on the merits filed on behalf of Pet.,  AT& T Corporation and AT&T Wireless Services Inc.
02/13/2004Reply to ResponsePetitioner Reply in support of petition for review on behalf of AT&T Corporation and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
02/09/2004Amicus Curiae Brief receivedReceived (instead of filed) on behalf of Cingular Wireless, LLC, et al., by G. Luke Ashley, et al., Thompson & Knight, 1700 Pacific Ave., Ste. 3300, Dallas, Texas  75201,  214-969-1700
02/02/2004Response to PetitionRespondent Respondents' response to petition for review
11/26/2003Appendix FiledPetitioner appendix attached to petition for review
11/26/2003Petition for ReviewPetitioner On behalf of AT&T Corp. and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/16/2003Case forwarded to Court 
12/11/2003Response Waiver filed  Response waiver to petition for review filed on behalf of Bryceland et al.
11/26/2003Appendix Filed  appendix attached to petition for review
11/26/2003Petition for Review  On behalf of AT&T Corp. and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
11/24/2004Letter Received  Letter rec'd in support of amicus curiae, Cellco Partnership et al.; urging The Court to grant the rehearing of Sept. 10, 2004 order denying the pet. for review.  Submitted by Seamus C. Duffy.    
11/23/2004Reply to Response  Petitioners' reply in support of rehearing.  On behalf of AT&T Corp and ST&T Wireless Services, Inc.
11/18/2004Response to Motion for Rehearing  Response in opposition to motion for rehearing filed on behalf of Charles Bryceland et al.
11/03/2004Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to the mo/re is due n/l/t 3:00 p.m., 11-18-04, mlbx rule d/n/a
10/28/2004Description of document returned to Supreme Court  Postcard t Mr. Robert J. Scott - remailed to correct address
10/19/2004Case forwarded to Court 
10/17/2003Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petitioner's m/e/t to file petition was granted until Nov. 26, 2003.
10/16/2003Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  On behalf of AT&T Corporation, et al.
10/12/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/12/2004Motion for Rehearing  On behalf of AT&T Corp and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
10/11/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
09/20/2004Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposedFiling granted Unopposed m/e/t to file mo/re granted.  Mo/re due October 12, 2004.  Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
09/17/2004Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing  2nd unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing filed on behalf of AT & T Corporation and AT & T Wireless Services Inc.
09/10/2004Petition for Review disposedDenied
05/13/2004Amended Brief filed  Petitioner amended reply brief on the merits
05/11/2004Reply Brief  Petitioners' brief in reply
04/26/2004Brief on the Merits  Respondents' brief on the merits
04/09/2004Brief on the Merits  Brief on the merits filed on behalf of Pet.,  AT& T Corporation and AT&T Wireless Services Inc.
03/18/2004Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Pet m/e/t to file brief on the merits is granted.  Pet brief is due 4/12/04, Resp brief is due 5/3/04, Reply brief is due 5/18/04.  Briefs due n/l/t 3:00 p.m.; mlbx rule d/n/a.
03/17/2004Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Petitioner's unopposed m/e/t to file brief on the merits
03/10/2004Record Received (See Remarks)  Inventory in remarks
03/09/2005Case Stored  G02/14-A-5
03/07/2005Mandate issued  Mandate and cost bill issued.
02/26/2004Brief on the Merits Ordered  Pet brief is due 03-29-04, resp brief is due 04-19-04, reply brief is due 05-04-04; mlbx rule d/n/a
02/25/2004Record Requested in Case  Emailed Cathy Henderson @ 5th CA
02/19/2004Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks.Filing granted Seamus C. Duffy's motion for admission pro hac vice was granted.
02/19/2004Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks.Filing granted G. Luke Ashley's motion in support of motion for admission pro hac vice of Seamus C. Duffy was granted.
02/16/2005Petition for Review disposedFiling dismissed per settlement
02/16/2005Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued See related documents
02/16/2005Petition for Review granted under TRAP 56.3Petition granted motion under TRAP 56.3 Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 56.3, without hearing oral argument or considering the merits, the court of appeals' judgment is set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties
02/16/2005Motion to dismiss disposedmotion granted in part Joint motion to effectuate settlement granted in part.  & motion to vacate COA judgment deneid
02/14/2005Motion to dismiss  Joint motion to effectuate settlement.
02/13/2004Reply to Response  Reply in support of petition for review on behalf of AT&T Corporation and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
02/11/2005Call received  Both sides called to inform the Court this case has settled. Will fax letter stating they have settled and will file motion to withdraw due to settlement on Monday 02-14-05,
02/09/2004Amicus Curiae Brief received  on behalf of Cingular Wireless, LLC, et al., by G. Luke Ashley, et al., Thompson & Knight, 1700 Pacific Ave., Ste. 3300, Dallas, Texas  75201,  214-969-1700
02/06/2004Miscellaneous Motion  Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Seamus C. Duffy
02/06/2004Miscellaneous Motion  Motion of G. Luke Ashley in support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Seamus C. Duffy
02/02/2004Response to Petition  Respondents' response to petition for review
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #03094806  Petitioners' Amended Reply Brief on the Merits
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #03094805  Petitioners' Brief on the Merits
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #03094804  Petitioners' Reply Brief
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #03094803  Petition for Review
01/26/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #03094802  Respondents' Brief on the Merits
01/26/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #03094801  Response to Petition
01/21/2005Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument To be argued 02-16-05
01/21/2005Petition for Review granted 
01/21/2005Petition for Review disposedFiling granted
01/21/2005Previous Order of the Court withdrawn  Order issued September 10, 2004 denying the petition for review is withdrawn.
01/21/2005Motion for Rehearing - DisposedFiling granted
01/05/2004Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  requested response is due n/l/t 5:00 p.m., 02-04-04, mlbx rule d/n/a
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
03/09/2005Case StoredCase stored.G02/14-A-5
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.PetitionerMr. Jeffrey S. Levinger
Bryceland, CharlesRespondentMr. Lawrence Lassiter
Mr. Robert J. Scott
Brawner, Karl B.RespondentMr. Robert J. Scott
Cingular Wireless LLCAmicus CuriaeMr. G. Luke Ashley
Mr. Seamus C. Duffy
Christensen, William CarlRespondentMr. Robert J. Scott
Cellco Partnership Amicus CuriaeMr. G. Luke Ashley
T-Mobile USA, Inc.Amicus CuriaeMr. G. Luke Ashley
Nextel Communications, Inc.Amicus CuriaeMr. G. Luke Ashley
AT&T CorporationPetitionerMs. Pamela Stanton Baron
Mr. R. Laurence Macon
Mr. Jeffrey S. Levinger
Mr. John L. Hendricks
Court of Appeals Information:
REV'D/REN'D/REM'D 
114 SW3d 552, 12-03-02 
5th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Frances Maloney 
Trial Court Information
County Court at Law No 3 
Dallas 
Honorable Robert C. Jenevein 
CC-99-13678-C