Supreme Court

Case: 04-0269    
04-0269
03/23/2004
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
TESCO AMERICAN, INC. D/B/A TESCO/WILLIAMSEN 
STRONG INDUSTRIES, INC. AND BROOKS STRONG 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
02/22/2005Additional citations received.Petitioner Notice of additional cites filed on behalf of Tesco American Inc.
02/22/2005Additional citations received.Petitioner Notice of additional cites filed on behalf of Tesco American Inc.
02/15/2005Exhibits in case/cause filedRespondent On behalf of Strong Industries, Inc.  Four additional authorities regarding the judicial disqualification issue that counsel may reference during oral arguments on 2/17/05.
12/14/2004Reply BriefPetitioner Tesco/Williamsen's Reply brief on the merits.
11/29/2004Brief on the MeritsRespondent Respondent's brief on the merits.  On behalf of Strong Industries and Brooks Strong.
11/17/2004Amicus Curiae Brief receivedAmicus Curiae Amicus Curiae brief on behalf of Luther H. Soules, III
11/08/2004Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Tesco American, Inc brief on the merits
07/15/2004Reply to ResponsePetitioner Tesco/Williamsen's reply to respondents' response to pet. for review
06/21/2004Response to PetitionRespondent Response to pet. for review on behalf of Strong Industries, Inc. and Brooks Strong
04/21/2004Appendix FiledPetitioner appendix attached to petition for review
04/21/2004Petition for ReviewPetitioner on behalf of Tesco/Williamsen
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
05/09/2006Case Stored  G01/29-C-3
05/09/2006Case remanded and record returned to the Court of Appeals.  case remanded and record returned to the 1st court of appeals
05/09/2006Mandate issued  Mandate and cost bill issued.
03/17/2006Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
03/17/2006Dissenting opinion issued.Issued
03/17/2006Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed; remanded to Court of Appeals
02/22/2005Additional citations received.  Notice of additional cites filed on behalf of Tesco American Inc.
02/22/2005Additional citations received.  Notice of additional cites filed on behalf of Tesco American Inc.
02/17/2005Oral argument   Argued on behalf of petitioner by Mr. Thomas C. Wright; Argued on behalf of respondents by Mr. Robert B. Dubose.
02/15/2005Exhibits in case/cause filed  On behalf of Strong Industries, Inc.  Four additional authorities regarding the judicial disqualification issue that counsel may reference during oral arguments on 2/17/05.
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04026906  Petitioners' Reply Brief on the Merits
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04026905  Respondents' Brief on the Merits
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04026904  Petitioner's Brief on the Merits
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04026903  Petitioner's Reply Brief
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04026902  Response to Petition for Review
01/31/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04026901  Petition for Review
01/21/2005Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument To be argued 02-17-05
01/21/2005Petition for Review granted  To be argued 02-17-05
01/21/2005Petition for Review disposedFiling granted To be argued 02-17-05
12/14/2004Reply Brief  Tesco/Williamsen's Reply brief on the merits.
11/29/2004Brief on the Merits  Respondent's brief on the merits.  On behalf of Strong Industries and Brooks Strong.
11/17/2004Amicus Curiae Brief received  Amicus Curiae brief on behalf of Luther H. Soules, III
11/08/2004Brief on the Merits  Tesco American, Inc brief on the merits
10/14/2004Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Petitioner m/e/t to file brief is granted until 11-8-04, resp br is due 11-29-04, reply br is due 12-14-04, all briefs are due n/l/t 3:00 p.m., mlbx rule d/n/a
10/14/2004Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief on the merits filed on behalf of Tsco/Williamsen
09/30/2004Record Received (See Remarks)  Inventory in remarks
09/16/2004Record Requested in Case  Emailed David Chino @ 1st COA
09/16/2004Brief on the Merits Ordered  Petitioner's brief is due n/l/t 3:00 p.m., 10-18-04, resp br is due 11-08-04, reply bri is due 11-23-04, mlbx rule d/n/a
07/15/2004Reply to Response  Tesco/Williamsen's reply to respondents' response to pet. for review
07/07/2004MET to file reply disposed ofFiling granted Pet's unopposed motion for extension of time to file a reply to the response the pet for review is granted until July 12, 2004.
07/02/2004Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed  Tesco/Williamsen's unopposed m/e/t to file a reply to the response to the pet. for review
06/21/2004Response Waiver filed  response waiver on behalf of F.S. New Products
06/21/2004Response to Petition  Response to pet. for review on behalf of Strong Industries, Inc. and Brooks Strong
05/21/2004Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Response is due June 21, 2004 n/l/t 3:00 pm., mlbx rule d/n/a  
04/28/2004Correction filed (See Remarks)  amended identity of parties and counsel
04/27/2004Case forwarded to Court 
04/23/2004Response Waiver filed  on behalf of Strong Industries, Inc. and Brooks Strong
04/21/2004Document received (See Remarks)  identity of parties and counsel rec'd via fax (orig. and 11 copies rec'd 4-22-04 by mail)
04/21/2004Appendix Filed  appendix attached to petition for review
04/21/2004Petition for Review  on behalf of Tesco/Williamsen
03/23/2004Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Tesco/Williamsen's unopposed m/e/t to file petition was granted until April 21, 2004.
03/23/2004Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  on behalf of Tesco American, Inc. d/b/a Tesco/Williamsen
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
05/09/2006Case StoredCase stored.G01/29-C-3
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Strong Industries, Inc.RespondentMr. S. Scott West
Mr. Robert B. Dubose
Mr. Robert M. Randy Roach Jr.
Mr. A. Reagan Clark
Mr. Stephen G. Tipps
Mr. Sean Reed Cox
Tesco American, Inc.PetitionerMr. Thomas C. Wright
Mr. Thomas G. Gruenert
Mr. George Fred Rhodes
Mr. Chad Michael Forbes
Mr. William V. Dorsaneo III
Strong, BrooksRespondentMr. Robert B. Dubose
Soules,, III, Luther H.Amicus CuriaeMr. Luther H. Soules III
Court of Appeals Information:
AFF'D/REV'D/REN'D 
129 SW3d 606, 02-05-04 
1st Court of Appeals 
Honorable Laura C. Higley 
Trial Court Information
11th District Court 
Harris 
Honorable Mark D. Davidson 
99-00011