Supreme Court

Case: 04-0340    
04-0340
04/09/2004
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
CITY OF WHITE SETTLEMENT, TEXAS 
SUPER WASH, INC. 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
02/09/2005Brief on the MeritsRespondent On behalf of Super Wash, Inc.
01/21/2005Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner's brief on the merits
07/13/2004Reply to ResponsePetitioner Petitioner's reply to the response of respondent
06/28/2004Response to PetitionRespondent response to petition for review
04/09/2004Appendix FiledPetitioner Appendix attached to pet. for review
04/09/2004Petition for ReviewPetitioner Pet. for review filed on behalf of City of White Settlement, Texas
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/22/2004Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Pet's m/e/t to file brief on the merits is granted.  Pet's br due n/l/t 3:00 p.m. on 1/21/05, Resp br due 2/10/05, Reply br due 2/25/05; mlbx rule d/n/a
12/21/2004Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Petitioner, City of White Settlement, Texas, motion to extend time to file petitioner's brief on the merits.
12/13/2004Record Received (See Remarks)  Inventory in remarks
12/08/2004Record Requested in Case  Emailed Rosemary Flores @ 2nd COA - cced Clerk, NV & CJ
12/08/2004Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested:  Pet brief due n/l/t 3:00 p.m. on 1/7/05, Resp br due 1/27/05, Reply br due 2/11/05; mlbx rule d/n/a
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
07/13/2004Reply to Response  Petitioner's reply to the response of respondent
06/28/2004Response to Petition  response to petition for review
06/02/2004Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to the petition for review is due n/l/t 3:00 p.m.; 07-02-04, mlbx rule d/n/a
05/11/2004Case forwarded to Court 
04/20/2006Case Stored  G02/29-C-3
04/19/2006Mandate issued  Mandate and cost bill issued.
04/13/2005Oral argument   Argued on behalf of petitioner by Michael R. Burkett;  argued on behalf of respondent by Hal R. Ray, Jr.
04/09/2004Notice requesting filing fee  Fee request sent to att., Michael R. Burkett, $75.00 filing fee for pet. for review.
04/09/2004Appendix Filed  Appendix attached to pet. for review
04/09/2004Petition for Review  Pet. for review filed on behalf of City of White Settlement, Texas
03/24/2005Submission resetOral argument re-set
03/23/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04034004  Respondent's Brief on the Merits 2/9/05
03/23/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04034003  Response to Petition for Review 6/28/04
03/11/2005Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument Set for oral argument at 9:00 am on 4/12/05
03/11/2005Petition for Review granted 
03/11/2005Petition for Review disposedFiling granted
03/03/2006Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
03/03/2006Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed & judgment rendered
02/09/2005Brief on the Merits  On behalf of Super Wash, Inc.
01/24/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04034002  Petitioner's Brief on the Merits
01/24/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04034001  Petition for Review
01/21/2005Brief on the Merits  Petitioner's brief on the merits
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
04/20/2006Case StoredCase stored.G02/29-C-3
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
City of White Settlement, Texas PetitionerMr. Michael R. Burkett
Super Wash, Inc. RespondentMr. Hal R. Ray Jr.
Court of Appeals Information:
AFF/REV/REN/REM 
131 SW3d 249, 02-26-04 
2nd Court of Appeals 
Honorable LeeAnn Dauphinot 
Trial Court Information
236th District Court 
Tarrant 
Honorable Thomas Wilson Lowe 
236-187433-01