Supreme Court

Case: 04-1103    
04-1103
12/10/2004
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 
JOHN W. BREITENFELD 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
04/18/2005Reply BriefPetitioner On behalf of SAS Institute Inc. in response to respondent's response to petitioner's brief on the merits.
03/31/2005Brief on the MeritsRespondent Brief on the merits filed on behalf of John W. Breitenfeld
03/14/2005Brief on the MeritsPetitioner On behalf of SAS Institute, Inc.
12/10/2004Appendix FiledPetitioner Appendix attached to pet. for review.
12/10/2004Petition for ReviewPetitioner Pet. for review filed on behalf of SAS Institute Inc.    
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/28/2004Case forwarded to Court 
12/21/2004Response Waiver filed  Response waiver to pet. for review filed on behalf of John Breitenfeld (1 copy only)
12/10/2004Appendix Filed  Appendix attached to pet. for review.
12/10/2004Petition for Review  Pet. for review filed on behalf of SAS Institute Inc.    
10/10/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/09/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/08/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
10/07/2020Brief from database  Refer to file-stamped date on the document for the actual file date.
08/15/2005Case Stored  G02/13-C-4
08/15/2005Mandate issued  Mandate and cost bill issued.
07/01/2005Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
07/01/2005Per Curiam OpinionCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed & judgment rendered Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and reinstates the judgment of the trial court.
07/01/2005Petition for Review granted under TRAP 59.1 
07/01/2005Petition for Review disposedPetition granted pursuant to TRAP 59.1
04/18/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04110303  Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits  4/18/05
04/18/2005Reply Brief  On behalf of SAS Institute Inc. in response to respondent's response to petitioner's brief on the merits.
03/31/2005Brief on the Merits  Brief on the merits filed on behalf of John W. Breitenfeld
03/23/2005Record Received (See Remarks)  see remarks for inventory.
03/14/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04110302  Petitioner's Brief on the Merits 3/14/05
03/14/2005Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #04110301  Petition for Review 12/10/04
03/14/2005Brief on the Merits  On behalf of SAS Institute, Inc.
02/14/2005Record Requested in Case  Emailed Claudia McCoy @ 5th COA  & cced Lisa Matz
02/11/2005Brief on the Merits Ordered  Pet brief due 03-14-05, resp brief is due 04-04-05, reply brief is due 04-19-05, all brief are due are due n/l/t 3:00 p.m., mlbx rule d/n/a
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
08/15/2005Case StoredCase stored.G02/13-C-4
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Breitenfeld, John W.RespondentMs. Teresa G. Sanchez
Mr. F. Colin Durham
Mr. Kyle G. Basinger
SAS Institute Inc. PetitionerMr. Curtis Dean Herms Jr.
Ms. Nancy L. Patterson
Ms. S. Shawn Stephens
Court of Appeals Information:
Rev/Rend/Affirmed 
147 SW3d 672, 10-28-04 
5th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Douglas S. Lang 
Trial Court Information
296th District Court 
Collin 
Honorable Betty Ann Caton 
296-689-03