Supreme Court

Case: 08-0169    
08-0169
03/03/2008
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
TANGIE WALTERS 
CLEVELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SHIRLEY KIEFER, AND KEITH SPOONER, M.D. 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
09/09/2008Reply BriefPetitioner PET's Reply BOM (12) filed on behalf of Tangie Walters.
08/25/2008Brief on the MeritsRespondent RSP's BOM (12) filed on behalf of Keith Spooner, M.D.
08/25/2008Brief on the MeritsRespondent Resps' brief on the merits.  On behalf of Cleveland Regional Medical Center, et al. (12)
07/29/2008Brief on the MeritsPetitioner On behalf of Tangie Walters. (11)
05/21/2008Response to PetitionRespondent Response to PFR (12) filed on behalf of Keith Spooner, M.D.
05/01/2008Response to PetitionRespondent Response to PFR (12) filed on behalf of Cleveland Regional Medical Center and Shirley Kiefer.
03/07/2008Supplement to Petition filedPetitioner Supplemental pet/rev.  On behalf of Tangie Walters.(12)
03/03/2008Appendix FiledPetitioner Attached to PFR
03/03/2008Petition for ReviewPetitioner PFR appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of Tangie Walters.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
09/09/2009Oral argument   argued on behalf of petitioner by Christopher Bradshaw-Hull; argued on behalf of rsp, Keith Spooner, by Diana L. Faust; argued on behalf of respondents, Cleveland Regional Medical Center and Shirley Kiefer, by Richard Sheehy
09/09/2008Reply Brief  PET's Reply BOM (12) filed on behalf of Tangie Walters.
08/25/2008Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #08016904  Spooner - Respondent's Brief on the Merits  Filed: 08/25/08
08/25/2008Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #08016903  CRMC - Respondents' Brief on the Merits  Filed: 08/25/08
08/25/2008Brief on the Merits  RSP's BOM (12) filed on behalf of Keith Spooner, M.D.
08/25/2008Brief on the Merits  Resps' brief on the merits.  On behalf of Cleveland Regional Medical Center, et al. (12)
08/21/2008Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Keith Spooner, M.D.'s M/e/t to file resp's bom is granted.   Resp's br is due n/l/t 3pm, August 25, 2008.  Reply br is due n/l/t 3pm, September 9, 2008.  Further requests will be disfavored.  Mailbox rule dna.
08/20/2008Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  RSP's Unopposed m/e/t to file bom (12) filed on behalf of Keith Spooner, M.D.
08/19/2008Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Cleveland Regional's M/e/t to file resp's bom is granted.   Resp's br is due n/l/t 3pm, August 25, 2008.  Reply br is due n/l/t 3pm, September 9, 2008.  Further requests will be disfavored.  Mailbox rule dna.
08/19/2008Call received  Mr. Bradshaw-Hull is unopposed to the m/e/t to file bom.
08/18/2008Phone call from Clerk's Office  Left message for Mr. Bradshaw-Hull.  Requested whether or not PET is opposed to M/E/T.
08/18/2008Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  RSP's m/e/t to file BOM (12) filed on behalf of Cleveland Regional Med. Ctr., et al.
08/12/2008Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted M/e/t to file pet's bom is granted.   Pet's br was filed July 29, 2008.  Resp's br is due n/l/t 3pm, August 18, 2008.  Reply br is due n/l/t 3pm, September 2, 2008.  Mailbox rule dna.
08/12/2008Call received  From Mr. Hull regarding his brief and m/e/t that he filed.  He said that after he looked at the brief he decided that it was better to file it as amended instead of substituting out the copies originally filed 7/29.  I told him that we still ended up subs. the copies with the amended brief and we removed from the cover that it was amended (to alleviate confusion).  I told him that his br was filed as of 7/29 and that his motion would be granted to that date.  He agreed and apologized for any confusion.
08/11/2008Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  PET's Unopposed m/e/t to file bom (12) filed on behalf of Tangie Walters.
08/04/2008Additional Copies received  Received the corrected BOM (12) filed on behalf of Tangie Walters.
08/04/2008Phone call from Clerk's Office  Spoke w/ Mr. Bradshaw-Hull.  He informed the Court that the m/e/t would be filed shortly.
07/31/2008Call received  Call from Mr. Bradshaw-Hull.  He will be filing an m/e/t to file bom along w/ corrected bom.
07/29/2008Brief on the Merits  On behalf of Tangie Walters. (11)
07/29/2008Phone call from Clerk's Office  Left vm w/ Mr. Bradshaw-Hull regarding his bom.  The brief is not signed or bound and we are missing one copy.  
07/24/2009Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  OA submission form submitted on behalf of petitioner by Christopher Bradshaw-Hull of Law Office of Christopher Bradshaw-Hull of Houston
07/20/2009Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  OA submission form submitted on behalf of rsp by Diana L. Faust of Cooper & Scully, P.C. of Dallas
07/16/2010Case Stored  G02 Row 16 B-5 (2 vols)
07/16/2009Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  OA submission form submitted on behalf of rsp by Richard Sheehy of Sheehy, Ware & Pappas of Houston
07/10/2009Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument Set for OA on 9/9/09 at 9:00 a.m.; time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes
07/10/2008Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #08016902  Spooner - Response to Petition  Filed: 05/21/08
07/10/2008Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #08016901  CRMC - Response to Petition  Filed: 05/01/08
07/01/2008Case Record Filed   inventory in main remarks
06/26/2008Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested:  Pet br due n/l/t 3:00 p.m. on 7/28/08; Rsp br due 8/18/08; Reply br due 9/2/08; mlbx rule d/n/a
06/26/2008Record Requested in Case 
05/21/2008Response to Petition  Response to PFR (12) filed on behalf of Keith Spooner, M.D.
05/07/2008Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted M/e/t to file response is granted.  Response is due nlt 3pm, May 21, 2008.  Further requests will be disfavored.  mailbox rule dna.
05/06/2008Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed m/e/t to file response to pfr (12) filed on behalf of Keith Spooner, M.D.
05/01/2008Response to Petition  Response to PFR (12) filed on behalf of Cleveland Regional Medical Center and Shirley Kiefer.
04/23/2010Mandate issued  Mandate & Cost Bill Issued
04/07/2008Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to petition for review due n/l/t 3:00 p.m. on 5/7/08; mlbx rule d/n/a
03/27/2009Petition for Review granted 
03/27/2009Petition for Review disposedFiling granted
03/12/2010Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
03/12/2010Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed; cause remanded to trial court
03/11/2008Case forwarded to Court 
03/07/2008Phone call from Clerk's Office  To Mr. Sheehy inquiring if he also represents Shirley Kiefer.  He confirmed that he does represent Shirley Kiefer.  He inadvertently left her out of the waiver.
03/07/2008Response Waiver filed  On behalf of respondent, Keith Spooner, M.D. (orig & 3 copies)
03/07/2008Response Waiver filed  On behalf of respondents, Cleveland Regional Medical Center & Shirley Kiefer (orig & 3 copies)
03/07/2008Supplement to Petition filed  Supplemental pet/rev.  On behalf of Tangie Walters.(12)
03/03/2008Appendix Filed  Attached to PFR
03/03/2008Petition for Review  PFR appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of Tangie Walters.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
07/16/2010Case StoredCase stored.G02 Row 16 B-5 (2 vols)
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Spooner, M..D. KeithRespondentMr. Matthew C. Kawalek
Ms. Devon J. Singh
Mr. Robert G. Smith Jr.
Ms. Diana L. Faust
Mr. Michael W. Blaise
Mr. R. Brent Cooper
Cleveland Regional Medical CenterRespondentMr. James Wilson Key Wilde
Mr. Richard Sheehy
Mr. M. Randall Jones
Walters, TangiePetitionerMr. Christopher Bradshaw-Hull
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed [duplicate 1] 
264 SW3d 154, 12-20-07 
1st Court of Appeals 
Honorable George C. Hanks 
Trial Court Information
125th District Court 
Harris 
Honorable John A. Coselli 
2005-54075