Supreme Court

Case: 09-0273    
09-0273
04/06/2009
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
MIDLAND CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT 
BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, AMERADA HESS TRADING COMPANY, CHEVRON USA, INC., CHEVRON TEXACO PRODUCTS COMPANY, CHEVRONTEXACO GLOBAL SUPPLY AND TRADING COMPANY, TEPPCO CRUDE OIL, LLC AND TEPPCO CRUDE P/L LLC 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
08/19/2010Letter brief Petitioner Petitioner, Midland Central Appraisal District's, letter brief in response to respondent's letter brief of 8/18/10. (orig & 11)
08/18/2010Letter brief Respondent Letter brief (12) filed on behalf of TEPPCO.
08/12/2010Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filedPetitioner Petitioner's reply to BP's response to motion for rehearing.  On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District.  (orig & 11)
08/09/2010Response to Motion for RehearingRespondent Respondents' response to petitioner's motion for rehearing.  On behalf of BP America Production Co., et al. (orig & 11)
07/29/2010Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filedPetitioner Reply to rehearing (12) filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal Dist.
07/22/2010Response to Motion for RehearingRespondent TEPPCO's Response to Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing. (3)
06/25/2010Letter brief Petitioner Letter brief filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District to bring to the Court's attention a treatise on state taxation that recently criticized the decisions by the intermediate court of appeals in this case.  (orig & 11)
05/14/2010Amicus Curiae Brief receivedReceived (instead of filed) Amicus curiae brief on behalf of TASB Legal Assistance Fund, submitted by Mr. Don Cruse, Law Office of Don Cruse, 1108 Lavaca, Suite 110-436, Austin, TX.  78701,  Phone (512) 853-9100, Fax (512) 870-9002. (orig & 11)
04/28/2010Motion for RehearingRehearing filed in Petition for Review Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing of Denial of Petition for Review. On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District. (12)
02/17/2010Additional citations received.Respondent Additional cites citing supplemental briefs submitted in U.S. Supreme Court case number 08-1458 Missouri Gas v. Schmidt on February 5, 2010.  Filed on behalf of TEPPCO.
01/28/2010Additional citations received.Petitioner PET's Citing Amicus Curie filed on Jan 26, 2010 in the Missouri Gase case, which is pending before the US Supreme Court.  See "In Re Assessment of Personal Property Taxes Against  Missouri Gas Energy, ---P.3d.---, 2008 WL 4648330 (Okla. Oct. 21, 2008). [Amicus brief attached to this letter] (12)  On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal Dist.
01/05/2010Amicus Curiae Letter ReceivedReceived (instead of filed) Amicus Letter (12) filed on behalf of Texas Pipeline Assoc'n.  Submitted by Chauncey M. Lane, Clark, Thomas & Winters, 300 W. Sixth St., 15th Fl., Austin, TX 78767, (512)474-1129.
12/18/2009Amicus Curiae Brief receivedReceived (instead of filed) Amicus brief on behalf of Plains Marketing, L.P., and Plains Marketing GP Inc. in support of Respondents.  Submitted by Marie R. Yeates, VINSON & ELKINS LLP, 1001 Fannin St., Ste. 2500, Houston, TX 77002.  [Ph.] 713-758-4576, [Fx.] 713-615-5544.  (12)
12/01/2009Reply BriefPetitioner Pet's REPLY brief on the merits to both Respondents' briefs.  On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District.
11/16/2009Brief on the MeritsRespondent RSP's brief on the merits (12) filed on behalf of TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC, et al.
11/16/2009Brief on the MeritsRespondent RSP's brief on the merits (12) filed on behalf of BP America Production Co., et al.
09/25/2009Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner's brief on the merits.  Filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District (orig & 11)
06/29/2009Reply to ResponsePetitioner PET's reply to TEPPCO's response (12) filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District.
06/29/2009Reply to ResponsePetitioner PET's reply to BP America Production Co. response(12) filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal Dist.
06/26/2009Response to PetitionRespondent Response to petition for review.   On behalf of TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and TEPPCO Crude P/L LLC. (12)
06/17/2009Response to PetitionRespondent Response to petition (12) filed on behalf of BP America Production Co.
05/20/2009Appendix FiledPetitioner Appendix attached to PFR.
05/20/2009Petition for ReviewPetitioner On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District. (12)
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/18/2009Amicus Curiae Brief received  Amicus brief on behalf of Plains Marketing, L.P., and Plains Marketing GP Inc. in support of Respondents.  Submitted by Marie R. Yeates, VINSON & ELKINS LLP, 1001 Fannin St., Ste. 2500, Houston, TX 77002.  [Ph.] 713-758-4576, [Fx.] 713-615-5544.  (12)
12/01/2009Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #09027306  Petitioner's Consolidated Reply Brief  Filed: 12/01/09
12/01/2009Reply Brief  Pet's REPLY brief on the merits to both Respondents' briefs.  On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District.
11/16/2009Electronic copies of brief posted to website  #09027305  BP - Respondent's Brief on the Merits  Filed: 11/16/09
11/16/2009Brief on the Merits  RSP's brief on the merits (12) filed on behalf of TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC, et al.
11/16/2009Brief on the Merits  RSP's brief on the merits (12) filed on behalf of BP America Production Co., et al.
10/29/2010Case Stored  Row 17 I-5
10/14/2009Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted BP's M/e/t to file resp's bom is granted.  Resp's br is due n/l/t 3pm, November 16, 2009.  Reply br is due n/l/t 3pm, December 1, 2009.  further reqs will be disfavored.  mailbox rule dna.  
10/13/2009Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  RSP's unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief on the merits (3) filed on behalf of BP America Production Co.
10/12/2009Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Teppco's M/e/t to file resp's bom is granted.  Resp's br is due n/l/t 3pm, November 16, 2009.  Reply br is due n/l/t 3pm, December 1, 2009.  further reqs will be disfavored.  mailbox rule dna.  
10/09/2009Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed m/e/t to file resps' brief on the merits. On behalf of Teppco Crude Oil LLC., et al. (3)
10/06/2010Record returned to Court of Appeals  Record returned to the Court of Appeals
10/01/2010Notice sent to Court of Appeals  Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
10/01/2010Motion for Rehearing - DisposedDenied
09/25/2009Brief on the Merits  Petitioner's brief on the merits.  Filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District (orig & 11)
09/21/2009Case Record Filed   INVENTORY IN MAIN REMARKS SECTION
08/31/2009Record Requested in Case 
08/26/2009Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits have been requested.  Petitioner's brief is due n/l/t 3pm, September 25, 2009.  Respondent's brief is due n/l/t 3pm, October 15, 2009.  Reply brief is due n/l/t 3pm, October 30, 2009.  Mailbox Rule dna.
08/19/2010Letter brief   Petitioner, Midland Central Appraisal District's, letter brief in response to respondent's letter brief of 8/18/10. (orig & 11)
08/18/2010Letter brief   Letter brief (12) filed on behalf of TEPPCO.
08/12/2010Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filed  Petitioner's reply to BP's response to motion for rehearing.  On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District.  (orig & 11)
08/09/2010Response to Motion for Rehearing  Respondents' response to petitioner's motion for rehearing.  On behalf of BP America Production Co., et al. (orig & 11)
07/29/2010Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filed  Reply to rehearing (12) filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal Dist.
07/22/2010Response to Motion for Rehearing  TEPPCO's Response to Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing. (3)
07/19/2010Letter Filed  From respondent, BP America Production Co., requesting that the Court link 09-0053 with 09-0273 for consideration of the motions for rehearing.  (orig & 11)
07/09/2010Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted BP's Response to Rehearing is due no later than 3pm, August 9, 2010.  no further requests will be considered.  mailbox rule does not apply
07/07/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Second unopposed motion for extension of time to file Response to Motion for Rehearing. On behalf of BP America Product Co., et al. (3)
06/30/2009Case forwarded to Court 
06/29/2009Reply to Response  PET's reply to TEPPCO's response (12) filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District.
06/29/2009Reply to Response  PET's reply to BP America Production Co. response(12) filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal Dist.
06/26/2009Response to Petition  Response to petition for review.   On behalf of TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC and TEPPCO Crude P/L LLC. (12)
06/25/2010Letter brief   Letter brief filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District to bring to the Court's attention a treatise on state taxation that recently criticized the decisions by the intermediate court of appeals in this case.  (orig & 11)
06/22/2009Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted TEPPCO's M/e/t to file response is granted.  Response is due June 29, 2009.  FURTHER REQS WILL BE DISFAVORED.
06/19/2009Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  RSP's unopposed motion for extension of time to file response (3) filed on behalf of TEPPCO Crude Oil LLC, et al.
06/17/2009Response to Petition  Response to petition (12) filed on behalf of BP America Production Co.
06/16/2010Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted TEPPCO's response to rehearing is due no later than 3pm, July 23, 2010.  FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED
06/16/2010Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted BP's response to rehearing is due no later than 3pm, July 23, 2010.  FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.  mailbox rule does not apply
06/15/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed motion for extension of time to file response (2) filed on behalf of Teppco Crude Oil LLC.
06/11/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed first motion for extension of time to file response (2) filed on behalf of BP America Production Co.
06/08/2010Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to motion for rehearing due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 6/23/10; mailbox rule does not apply
05/20/2009Appendix Filed  Appendix attached to PFR.
05/20/2009Petition for Review  On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District. (12)
05/14/2010Amicus Curiae Brief received  Amicus curiae brief on behalf of TASB Legal Assistance Fund, submitted by Mr. Don Cruse, Law Office of Don Cruse, 1108 Lavaca, Suite 110-436, Austin, TX.  78701,  Phone (512) 853-9100, Fax (512) 870-9002. (orig & 11)
05/04/2010Case forwarded to Court 
04/28/2010Motion for Rehearing  Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing of Denial of Petition for Review. On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District. (12)
04/07/2009Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted M/e/t to file pet/rev is granted.   Pet/rev is due June 1, 2009.
04/06/2009Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  PET's unopposed motion for extension of time to file (3) filed on behalf of Midland Central Appraisal Dist.
03/30/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposedFiling granted Motion to extend time to file motion for rehearing is granted.   Rehearing is due April 28, 2010.  FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED
03/29/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing  Unopposed m/e/t to file pet's mo/re. On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal District. (3)
03/12/2010Petition for Review disposedDenied
03/03/2010Letter Filed  Letter from Petitioner, Midland Central, letting the Court know that U.S. Sup. Ct. No. 08-1458 was denied on 3/1/10, and petitioner's are urging that the Court now grant petition for review. (12)
02/17/2010Additional citations received.  Additional cites citing supplemental briefs submitted in U.S. Supreme Court case number 08-1458 Missouri Gas v. Schmidt on February 5, 2010.  Filed on behalf of TEPPCO.
01/28/2010Additional citations received.  PET's Citing Amicus Curie filed on Jan 26, 2010 in the Missouri Gase case, which is pending before the US Supreme Court.  See "In Re Assessment of Personal Property Taxes Against  Missouri Gas Energy, ---P.3d.---, 2008 WL 4648330 (Okla. Oct. 21, 2008). [Amicus brief attached to this letter] (12)  On behalf of Midland Central Appraisal Dist.
01/05/2010Amicus Curiae Letter Received  Amicus Letter (12) filed on behalf of Texas Pipeline Assoc'n.  Submitted by Chauncey M. Lane, Clark, Thomas & Winters, 300 W. Sixth St., 15th Fl., Austin, TX 78767, (512)474-1129.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
10/29/2010Case StoredCase stored.Row 17 I-5
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
TEPPCO Crude Oil, LLCRespondentMr. William F. 'Bill' Ikard
Mr. Jeffrey Boyd
Ms. Jordan Haedicke Peltier
Mr. Raymond P. Albrecht
Mr. Cabrach J. Connor
Mr. Peter J. Hageman
Ms. Carrie Denise Helmcamp
Mr. Jeffery Frank Nadalo
Texas Pipeline AssociationAmicus CuriaeMr. Chauncey Marcus Lane
BP America Production Co.RespondentMr. Rodney W. Satterwhite
Ms. Lynne Liberato
Ms. Laurellen Ratliff
Midland Central Appraisal DistrictPetitionerMr. Matt John Morrison
Mr. Roy L. Armstrong
Mr. Raul A. Gonzalez
Mr. Roger D. Townsend
Ms. Amy Warr
Mr. Matthew Tepper
Mr. D. Kirk Swinney
Mr. Douglas W. Alexander
Mr. Frederick Bostwick III
TASB Legal Assistance FundAmicus CuriaeMr. Don W. Cruse Jr.
Plains Marketing, L.P.Amicus CuriaeMs. Marie R. Yeates
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed [duplicate 1] 
282 SW3d 215, 03-26-09 
11th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Jim Wright 
Trial Court Information
238th District Court 
Midland 
Honorable John G. Hyde 
CV44864