Supreme Court

Case: 10-0116    
10-0116
02/16/2010
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
MUNTERS EUROFORM GMBH 
AMERICAN NATIONAL POWER, INC. AND HAYS ENERGY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
03/03/2010Appendix FiledPetitioner attached to petition
03/03/2010Petition for ReviewPetitioner PFR appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of Mutners Euroform GmbH.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
07/30/2010Case Stored  G02 Row 17 F-3
07/20/2010Notice sent to Court of Appeals  Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
07/16/2010Petition for Review disposedDismissed
07/16/2010Motion to dismiss disposedFiling granted Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review granted
07/12/2010Motion to dismiss  Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review filed on behalf of Munters Euroform GmbH. (2)
07/07/2010Call received  Call from Mr. Craddock letting the Court know that the motion to dismiss will be filed by the end of the week.
07/07/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  Left message with Mr. Craddock checking the status of their motion to dismiss.
06/24/2010Call received  Call from Mr. Cook letting the Court know that the settlement is complete.  He will talk to opposing counsel on filing a motion to dismiss.
06/23/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  Left message with Mr. Cook checking status of settlement.
06/04/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  Spoke with Mr. Cook checking the status of the motion to dismiss.  Per Mr. Cook, they have hit a glitch in the settlement process, but he is still hopeful.  He asks that the Court hold off on forwarding the case for another 15 days.
04/30/2010Call received  Mr. Cook called back and said that they are in the process of getting a motion filed with our Court.  (see letter filed 3/31/10)
04/30/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  Left message with Mr. Cook inquiring about the status of their potential agreement.  (see letter filed 3/31/10)
03/31/2010Letter Filed  The parties have reached an agreement, consequently, they request that the Court postpone Pet/Rev consideration.  They expect that the Pet/Rev will be withdrawn and that no further action will be required by the Court. (3) On behalf of American National Power, Inc., et al.
03/05/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  Left message for Mr. Craddick.  Requested electronic copy of petition.
03/03/2010Appendix Filed  attached to petition
03/03/2010Petition for Review  PFR appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of Mutners Euroform GmbH.
02/19/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted M/e/t to file pet/rev is granted.   Pet/rev is due March 3, 2010
02/18/2010Call received  from Mr. Cook's assistant to inform the Court that they are opposed to pet's m/e/t but won't file a response to it.
02/17/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  to Mr. Cook.  RE: to inquire whether he intend to file a response to pet's m/e/t or not.  Left msg w/assistant.
02/16/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  M/E/T to file pet/rev. On behalf of Munters Euroform GmbH. (3)
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
07/30/2010Case StoredCase stored.G02 Row 17 F-3
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
American National Power, Inc.RespondentMr. Thomas H. Cook Jr.
Ms. Ashley Bennett Jones
Munters Euroform GmbHPetitionerMr. Michael Dean Moody
Mr. Daniel K. Craddock
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed [duplicate 1] 
___ SW3d ___, 12-31-09 
3rd Court of Appeals 
Honorable Alan Waldrop 
Trial Court Information
22nd District Court 
Hays 
Honorable Ron Carr 
02-1232