Supreme Court

Case: 10-0366    
10-0366
05/20/2010
Mandamus/Cause
IN RE JOHN DOES 1 AND 2 
 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
08/02/2010Reply BriefRelator Relators' Reply Brief on the Merits. On behalf of John Does 1 & 2. (12)
07/26/2010Waiver of Brief on the MeritsReal Parties in Interest Real Party in Interest Google, Inc. elects to rely on its Response to Mandamus in lieu of filing an additional brief. (12)
07/23/2010Brief on the MeritsReal Parties in Interest Real parties in interest, PRK Enterprises, Inc. and Klein Investments, Inc., brief on the merits. (orig & 11)
07/06/2010Waiver of Brief on the MeritsRelator Brief waiver (3) filed on behalf of John Does 1 and 2.
05/28/2010Appendix FiledReal Parties in Interest Appendix to Response to Mandamus and Motion for Emergency Stay (incorporated). On behalf of Google Inc. (12)
05/28/2010Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus FiledReal Parties in Interest Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus (incorporated w/response to motion for emergency stay). On behalf of Google Inc.
05/28/2010Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus FiledReal Parties in Interest Response to petition (2) filed on behalf of PRK Enterprises, Inc.
05/20/2010Appendix FiledRelator Appendix attached to Mandamus.
05/20/2010Petition for Writ of Mandamus filedRelator On behalf of John Does 1 and 2. (12)
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
07/18/2011Case Stored  G02 Row 19 F-3
05/27/2011Certified cys of cost bill sent to attys of record  Cost Bill Issued
04/15/2011Opinion issuedWrit of Mandamus conditionally granted
04/15/2011Mandamus granted pursuant to TRAP 52.8 
04/15/2011Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposedPetition granted pursuant to TRAP 52.8(c)
08/02/2010Reply Brief  Relators' Reply Brief on the Merits. On behalf of John Does 1 & 2. (12)
07/26/2010Waiver of Brief on the Merits  Real Party in Interest Google, Inc. elects to rely on its Response to Mandamus in lieu of filing an additional brief. (12)
07/23/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  To Mr. John S. Morgan's office, atty for rlp, to request electronic copy of brief on the merits filed 7/23/10.
07/23/2010Brief on the Merits  Real parties in interest, PRK Enterprises, Inc. and Klein Investments, Inc., brief on the merits. (orig & 11)
07/06/2010Waiver of Brief on the Merits  Brief waiver (3) filed on behalf of John Does 1 and 2.
06/04/2010Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested:  Rel's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 7/5/10; Rlp brief due 7/26/10; Reply brief due 8/10/10; mailbox rule does not apply
06/04/2010Stay Order issued 
06/04/2010Motion to Stay DisposedFiling granted Motion for emergency stay granted
06/01/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  to Mr. Lynch. Re: to enforce SC order 10-9065 (e-copies of docs);   s/w his assistant and she will send us an email copy of the response to mandamus and motion.
06/01/2010Additional Copies received  COPIES REC'D:  Response to petition (10) filed on behalf of PRK Enterprises, Inc.
05/28/2010Appendix Filed  Appendix to Response to Mandamus and Motion for Emergency Stay (incorporated). On behalf of Google Inc. (12)
05/28/2010Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed  Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus (incorporated w/response to motion for emergency stay). On behalf of Google Inc.
05/28/2010Response to Motion filed  Response to Motion for Emergency Stay (incorporated w/response to mandamus). On behalf of Google Inc. (12)
05/28/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  Andrea informed the Court that she would send 10 additional copies of the response to mandamus via overnight delivery.
05/28/2010Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed  Response to petition (2) filed on behalf of PRK Enterprises, Inc.
05/28/2010Response to Motion filed  Response to motion for emergency stay (2) filed on behalf of PRK Enterprises, Inc.
05/21/2010Call received  Secretary for Mr. Dorrell called to inform us that they bought the "adobe software" in order to provide us the electronic copy of the mandamus.  She said that they should get the software today, althought, they intend to send the electronic copy on Monday, May 24.
05/20/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  Call made to real party attys Dennis Lynch and John Stephen Morgan regarding Court's request for responses to both emergency motion and petition for writ of mandamus due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 5/27/10; mailbox rule does not apply.  Email is acceptable with hard copies to follow.  Left voicemails to both attorneys
05/20/2010Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to both the motion for emergency stay and to the petition for writ of mandamus due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 5/27/10 p.m.; mailbox rule does not apply
05/20/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  to Mr. Dorrell.  RE: to enforce SC order 10-9065 (e-copies of docs); spoke with his assistant and she will send us an email copy of the mandamus and motion.
05/20/2010Motion to Stay Filed   Motion for emergency stay filed on behalf of John Does 1 & 2. (12)
05/20/2010Appendix Filed  Appendix attached to Mandamus.
05/20/2010Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed  On behalf of John Does 1 and 2. (12)
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
07/18/2011Case StoredCase stored.G02 Row 19 F-3
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
www.operationkleinwatch.blogspot.comReal Party in Interest  
Blogger.comReal Party in Interest  
PRK Enterprises, Inc.Real Party in Interest Mr. John S. Morgan
Google, Inc.Real Party in Interest Mr. Dennis M. Lynch
John Does 1 and 2RelatorMr. Jeffrey L. Dorrell
Court of Appeals Information:
Denied 
___ SW3d ___, 04-29-10 
9th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Per Curiam 
Trial Court Information
172nd District Court 
Jefferson 
Honorable Donald J. Floyd 
184,784