| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/22/2010 | Case Record Filed | |
Electronic Record. Inventory in main remarks.
|
|
| 12/17/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Joint/Unopposed motion for extension of time to file full briefing granted. Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 2/3/11; Response brief due 2/23/11; Reply brief due 3/10/11; mailbox rule does not apply. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 12/16/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
JOINT & Unopposed motion for extension of time to file Petitioners' Briefs. On behalf of Petitioner 1 City of Houston and Petitioner 2 Sarge's Fireworks. (2)
|
|
| 12/09/2010 | Record Requested in Case | |
|
|
| 12/03/2010 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Brief on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief on the merits due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 1/3/11; Respondents brief due 1/24/11; Reply brief due 2/8/11; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 11/18/2011 | Case Stored | |
G02 ROW 19 J-5 (2 VOLS)
|
|
| 10/20/2011 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 10/01/2010 | Response to Petition | |
Response to petition (2) filed on behalf of Sarge's Fireworks.
|
|
| 09/27/2010 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Call made to attorney Denice Smith letting her know the motion for extension of time was granted; left voicemail.
|
|
| 09/27/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Sarge's motion for extension of time to file response granted. Response due 9/27/10; mailbox rule does not apply. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 09/24/2010 | Call received | |
Call received stating parties are unopposed to motion for extension of time filed 9/24/10
|
|
| 09/24/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
Motion for extension of time to file response (2) filed on behalf of Sarge's Fireworks.
|
|
| 09/08/2010 | Response to Petition | |
The Harris County Municipal Utility District #152's Response to Petition for Review filed by Sarges Fireworks, et al. (12)
|
|
| 09/08/2010 | Response to Petition | |
Response to petition (12) filed on behalf of City of Houston.
|
|
| 09/08/2010 | Response to Petition | |
The Harris County Municipal Utility District #132 & #157's Response to Petition for Review. (12)
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Petition for Review disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Petition for Review disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 07/26/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Responses are due no later than 3pm, September 8, 2010. further requests will be disfavored. mailbox rule does not apply.
|
|
| 07/23/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
JOINT motion for extension of time to file response[s] to petition[s] for review. On behalf of Pet/Cross-Respondent City of Houston, Respondent/Cross-Pet Sarges Fireworks, et al., Other Parties, MUD #132 & 157 and Other Party MUD #152. (3)
|
|
| 07/09/2010 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 8/9/10; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 07/09/2010 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response waiver filed on behalf of Harris County Municipal District Numbers 132 & 157. (12)
|
|
| 07/06/2010 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response waiver (3) filed on behalf of The City of Houston.
|
|
| 07/06/2010 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response waiver (3) filed on behalf of Harris County Mun. Util. Dist. No. 132.
|
|
| 06/30/2011 | Letter Filed | |
E-FILED Respondents/Cross-Petitioners #2 Sarge's Fireworks, et al.'s Letter to advise the Court about two bills "SB 1082 & SB 917" that consists about the subject matter of this case. (HARD COPIES RECEIVED)
|
|
| 06/30/2011 | Call received | |
Ms. Smith informed the Court that she sent the letter to the physical address. She will e-file the letter to the Court, and we will receive two sets.
|
|
| 06/29/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Left message for Ms. Smith. Requested status of letter.
|
|
| 06/29/2011 | Letter Filed | |
E-FILED Letter in response to Sarge's Letter filed on 6-30-11. On behalf of the City of Houston.
|
|
| 06/29/2010 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 06/29/2010 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 06/24/2010 | Appendix Filed | |
Appendix attached to Petition for Review #2.
|
|
| 06/24/2010 | Petition for Review #2 | |
On behalf of Sarge's Fireworks, et al. (12)
|
|
| 06/23/2010 | Brief on the Merits | |
The Harris County Municipal Utility District #152 brief statement in support of the City of Houston's petition for review. (orig & 11)
|
|
| 06/23/2010 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response waiver to petition for review filed on behalf of other party, The Harris County Municipal Utility District, #152 (orig & 11)
|
|
| 06/01/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
Sarge's Fireworks' Petition is due June 22, 2010
|
|
| 05/28/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review #2 filed | |
Unopposed motion for extension of time to file petition (2) filed on behalf of Sarges Fireworks.
|
|
| 05/21/2010 | Appendix Filed | |
attached to petition
|
|
| 05/21/2010 | Petition for Review | |
Petition appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of the City of Houston, Texas.
|
|
| 03/17/2011 | Letter Filed | |
Letter informs the Court that a reply brief on the merits will not be filed (2) filed on behalf of the City of Houston.
|
|
| 03/15/2011 | Call received | |
Ms. Ramsey informed the Court that the City of Houston does not intend to file a reply brief on the merits. She will notify the Court in writing also.
|
|
| 03/03/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Response to City of Houston's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Sarge's Fireworks, et al. (12)
|
|
| 03/02/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Spoke with Mr. Hightower (other party: Harris County Municipal Utility District #152) and he will send original copy with signature page asap.
|
|
| 03/02/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Response to Petitioner Sarge's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of The Harris County Municipal Utility District #152. (12)
|
|
| 03/02/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Harris County Municipal Utility District Number 132's and Harris County Municipal Utility District Number 157's Response to Cross-Petitioner Sarge's Brief on the Merits. (12)
|
|
| 02/28/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Spoke with attorney Ramsey and requested e-copy of brief in converted form instead of scanned.
|
|
| 02/28/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Response to Cross-Petitioners' Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of the City of Houston. (12)
|
|
| 02/28/2011 | Designation of Lead Counsel | |
Designation of lead counsel: Judith Ramsey, Sr. Asst. City Atty., city of Houston Legal Dept., 900 Bagby, 4th Floor, Houston, TX, 77002, (832)393-6468 (2) filed on behalf of the City of Houston.
|
|
| 02/10/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Joint unopposed motion to extend time to file brief on the merits granted. Petitioner City's briefs was filed on 2/3/11; Petitioner Sarge's brief was filed 2/7/11; Response briefs due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 3/2/11; Reply brief due 3/17/11; mailbox rule does not apply. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 02/07/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Joint and unopposed agreed motion for extension of time to file brief (2) filed on behalf of City of Houston and Sarges Fireworks, et al.
|
|
| 02/07/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Brief on the merits (12) filed on behalf of Sarge's Fireworks.
|
|
| 02/03/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Brief on the merits (12) filed on behalf of The City of Houston, Texas.
|
|
| 02/03/2011 | Call received | |
Spoke with petitioner attorney Denise Miller who had concerns about the filing of the City's brief on the merits due today. Electronic version has been sent to SCEbriefs but hard copies via FedEx have been grounded due to inclement weather. Ms. Miller said another set is on the way via UPS but they may not get here until tomorrow.
|
|
| 02/02/2011 | Call received | |
Spoke with Judith who was concerned the brief on the merits that was sent to fedex on Monday, 01/31/11, had not been received. She said she will attempt to send by other means.
|
|