| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/31/2010 | Case Stored | |
Row 18 D-4
|
|
| 11/05/2010 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 11/02/2010 | Reply to Petition for Writ of Mandamus | |
Reply to response (12) filed on behalf of James W. Loose.
|
|
| 10/27/2010 | Call received | |
From Mr. Jim Pikl, atty for rel, to inform the Court that he will be filing a reply to rlp's response to mandamus by tomorrow or Friday at the latest.
|
|
| 10/25/2010 | Appendix Filed | |
Appendix (12) filed on behalf of Gary and Nancy West.
|
|
| 10/25/2010 | Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed | |
Response to petition (12) filed on behalf of Gary and Nacia West.
|
|
| 10/15/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Response is due no later than 3pm, 10/25/10. further requests will be disfavored. mailbox rule does not apply.
|
|
| 10/14/2010 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Spoke with Mr. Michel letting him know that his motion has been granted and his response will now be due on 10/25/10.
|
|
| 10/14/2010 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Mr. Pikl will not be filing a response to the motion.
|
|
| 10/14/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
Opposed motion for extension of time to file response (2) filed on behalf of Gary and Nacia West.
|
|
| 10/13/2010 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Call made to Thomas Michel regarding his call to our office about a motion for extension of time to file response to mandamus. Left voicemail.
|
|
| 09/30/2010 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for writ of mandamus due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 10/18/10; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 09/28/2010 | Case Record Filed | |
Record in support of Mandamus (11). On behalf fo James W. Loose.
|
|
| 09/28/2010 | Appendix Filed | |
Appendix attached to Mandamus.
|
|
| 09/28/2010 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed | |
On behalf of J.W.L. (11)
|
|