| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/28/2010 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
made called and sent email to Mr. Anderson and his Assistant Ms. Wall to inform them that they needs to resubmit the electronic copy of petitioner's reply. I explained that it needs to be an unscanned and searchable version.
|
|
| 12/23/2010 | Reply to Response | |
Reply to Response to Petition for Review. On behalf of Windle Turley, et al. (12)
|
|
| 12/09/2010 | Response to Petition | |
Response to petition (12) filed on behalf of City of Dallas.
|
|
| 11/28/2011 | Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filed | |
E-FILED Reply to City of Dallas' Response to Motion for Rehearing from the Denial of Petition for Review. On behalf of Petitioner Windle Turley, et al.
|
|
| 11/09/2010 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 12/9/10; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 11/08/2011 | Response to Motion for Rehearing | |
E-FILED Response to Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of City of Dallas. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 11/01/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Spoke with Paul, asst. for Mr. Caso. Informed him that the Motion for Extension of time was granted in part, giving the party 30 days rather than 38 days. Informed him that a second request for an entension of time will be disfavored, but will be considered.
|
|
| 11/01/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response granted in part. Response is due November 30, 2011.
|
|
| 10/26/2010 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 10/21/2010 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response waiver to petition for review filed on behalf of City of Dallas. (orig & 11)
|
|
| 10/19/2010 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
sent reply email to Mr. Anderson's assistant, Paget Grimes, to inform that they need to resubmit the electronic copy of petition for review. I explained that it needs to be an unscanned and searchable version.
|
|
| 10/18/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
E-FILED Unopposed motion for extension of time to file response filed on behalf of the City of Dallas.
|
|
| 10/18/2010 | Judgment from the Court of Appeals | |
(12) copies of the 5th court of appeals' judgment. On behalf of Windle Turley, et al. (12)
|
|
| 10/18/2010 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
to Mr. Anderson. RE: to request (12) copies of the court of appeals' judgment and electronic copy of petition (per SC #10-9065). Left message.
|
|
| 10/15/2010 | Appendix Filed | |
Appendix attached to Petition for Review.
|
|
| 10/15/2010 | Petition for Review | |
On behalf of Windle Turley, et al. (12)
|
|
| 10/14/2011 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Response due October 31, 2011.
|
|
| 10/05/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
Petition is due October 15, 2010
|
|
| 10/04/2010 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | |
Unopposed motion for extension of time to file Petition for Review. On behalf of Windle Turley, et al. (3)
|
|
| 09/20/2011 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 09/16/2011 | Motion for Rehearing | |
E-FILED PETITIONER WINDLE TURLEY, ET AL.'S MOTION FOR REHEARING.
PRINTED HARD COPY FOR STORING CASE
|
|
| 09/07/2011 | Description of document returned to Supreme Court | |
Postcard to resp's atty, Ms. Barbara Rosenberg. Called to verify address.
|
|
| 09/07/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposed | Filing granted |
Unopposed motion for extension of time to file petition for review granted. Motion for rehearing due 9/19/11. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 09/06/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing | |
E-FILED Unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion for rehearing filed on behalf of Windle Turley, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Petition for Review disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 06/10/2011 | Reply Brief | |
Reply brief on the merits (12) filed on behalf of Windle Turley, et al.
|
|
| 05/25/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Left message for attorney Rosenberg's assistant to send e-copy as soon as possible.
|
|
| 05/25/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Respondent's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of the City of Dallas. (12)
|
|
| 04/15/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Respondent's unopposed motion to extend time to file brief on the merits granted. Response brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 5/26/11; Reply brief due 6/10/11; mailbox rule does not apply if fiilng by paper. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 04/14/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Respondent's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of the City of Dallas. (2)
|
|
| 03/21/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
Petitioner's brief on the merits filed on behalf of Windle Turley, et al. (orig & 11)
|
|
| 03/07/2012 | Case Stored | |
Row 20 F-1
|
|
| 02/28/2012 | Record returned to Court of Appeals | |
Record returned to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 02/27/2012 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 02/17/2012 | Motion for Rehearing - Disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 02/09/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief on the merits granted. Petitioner brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 3/28/11; Response brief due 4/18/11; Reply brief due 5/3/11; mailbox rule does not apply. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 01/27/2011 | Case Record Filed | |
INVENTORY IN MAIN REMARKS SECTION
|
|
| 01/21/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Unopposed motion for extension of time to file Petitioners' Brief on the Merits. On behalf of Windle Turley, et al. (2)
|
|
| 01/18/2011 | Record Requested in Case | |
|
|
| 01/14/2011 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Brief on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief on the merits due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 2/14/11; Response brief due 3/7/11; Reply brief due 3/22/11; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|