Supreme Court

Case: 10-0938    
10-0938
11/15/2010
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
STANLEY V. GRAFF 
2920 PARK GROVE VENTURE, LTD., CAREY PLATT AND CEC REALTY 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/06/2011Reply BriefPetitioner E-FILED  Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Stanley V. Graff.  HARD COPIES RECEIVED.
08/31/2011Brief on the MeritsRespondent E-FILED  Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of 2920 Park Grove Venture, Ltd., et al.  HARD COPIES RECEIVED.
07/11/2011Brief on the MeritsPetitioner EFILED Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Stanley V. Graff (HARD COPIES REC'D)
05/16/2011Reply to ResponsePetitioner E-FILED  Reply to Petition filed on behalf of Stanley Graff. ( 2 HARD COPIES REC'D)
04/15/2011Response to PetitionRespondent Response to petition for review filed on behalf of 2929 Park Grove Venture, LTD., et al. (orig & 11)
01/04/2011Supplemental appendix Petitioner Supplemental appendix to petition for review (COA judgment) on behalf of Stanley V. Graff (orig & 11)
12/30/2010Appendix FiledPetitioner Appendix attached to PFR.
12/30/2010Petition for ReviewPetitioner On behalf of Stanley V. Graff. (12)
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/30/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  to Mr. Phillips.  RE: to request (12) copies of the court of appeals' judgment.
12/30/2010Appendix Filed  Appendix attached to PFR.
12/30/2010Petition for Review  On behalf of Stanley V. Graff. (12)
12/16/2011Petition for Review disposedDenied
12/14/2010Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petition is due December 30, 2010. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED
12/10/2010Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Unopposed second motion for extension of time to file Petition for Review. On behalf of Stanley V. Graff. (2)
11/18/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petition is due December 15, 2010
11/15/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Unopposed motion for extension of time to file petition (2) filed on behalf of Stanley V. Graff.
10/06/2011Reply Brief  E-FILED  Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Stanley V. Graff.  HARD COPIES RECEIVED.
09/12/2011Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits granted.  Reply brief due 10/6/11.  Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
09/08/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  E-FILED  Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits. On behalf of Stanley V. Graff.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
08/31/2011Brief on the Merits  E-FILED  Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of 2920 Park Grove Venture, Ltd., et al.  HARD COPIES RECEIVED.
08/04/2011Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Respondent's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted.  Response brief on the merits due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 8/31/11; Reply brief due 9/15/11; mailbox rule does not apply.  Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
08/03/2011Phone call from Clerk's Office  Call made to Allison Jurecko requesting filing fee of $10 for respondent's unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief on the merits; left voicemail.
08/02/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Respondent's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to File Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of 2920 Park Grove Venture, Ltd., et al. (2)
07/11/2011Brief on the Merits  EFILED Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Stanley V. Graff (HARD COPIES REC'D)
06/15/2011Case Record Filed   Inventory in main remarks
06/14/2011Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Brief on the Merits granted.  Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 7/11/11; Response brief due 8/1/11; Reply brief due 8/16/11; mailbox rule does not apply.  Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
06/14/2011Call received  Mr. Brown informed the Court that the motion is unopposed.
06/14/2011Phone call from Clerk's Office  to Mr. Brown. RE: to inquire whether or not petitioner's motion is opposed or unopposed.  Left message on both, Mr. Brown's and his assistant's answering machine.
06/14/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  E-FILED  Motion for Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Brief on the Merits. On behalf of Stanley V. Graff. (HARD COPIES RECEIVED)
06/01/2011Record Requested in Case 
05/27/2011Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested:  Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 6/27/11; Response brief due 7/18/11; Reply brief due 08/02/11; mailbox rule does not apply
05/16/2011Reply to Response  E-FILED  Reply to Petition filed on behalf of Stanley Graff. ( 2 HARD COPIES REC'D)
04/28/2011MET to file reply disposed ofFiling granted Unopposed first motion for an extension of time to file reply to the response to petition for review granted.  Reply due 5/16/11.  Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
04/28/2011Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed  E-FILED: Unopposed First Motion for an Extension of Time to File Reply to the Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf Stanley V. Graff. (hard copies received)
04/15/2011Phone call from Clerk's Office  To Mr. Christopher Brown's office and left message on voice mail for his asst. to submit e-copy of response filed today.
04/15/2011Response to Petition  Response to petition for review filed on behalf of 2929 Park Grove Venture, LTD., et al. (orig & 11)
03/08/2011Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Respondent's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file requested response to petition for review granted.  Requested response to petition due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 4/15/11; mailbox rule does not apply.  Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
03/07/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed motion for extension of time to file Response to Petition for Review. On behalf of 2920 Park Grove Venture, Ltd., et al.(3)
02/14/2011Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 3/16/11; mailbox rule does not apply
02/02/2012Case Stored  Row 20 H3
01/26/2012Record returned to Court of Appeals  Record returned to the Court of Appeals
01/25/2012Notice sent to Court of Appeals  Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
01/25/2011Case forwarded to Court 
01/21/2011Response Waiver filed  Response waiver filed on behalf of 2920 Park Grove Venture, Ltd., et al. (3)
01/04/2011Supplemental appendix   Supplemental appendix to petition for review (COA judgment) on behalf of Stanley V. Graff (orig & 11)
01/03/2011Call received  From Mr. Chaiken's office (Sara Longmore) to verify their address.  (Name of law firm has changed).
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
02/02/2012Case StoredCase stored.Row 20 H 3
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Graff, Stanley V.PetitionerMr. Thomas V. Murto III
Mr. Robert Holmes
Mr. Thomas Phillips
Mr. Mitchell Madden
Ms. Martha Garrison Newton
2920 Park Grove Venture, Ltd.RespondentMs. Lindsey Christina Lund
Mr. Kenneth Bruce Chaiken
Mr. Christopher A. Brown
Mr. G. Roland Love
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed [duplicate 3] 
___ SW3d ___, 10-13-09 
5th Court of Appeals 
Honorable David L. Bridges 
Trial Court Information
162nd District Court 
Dallas 
Honorable Lorraine A. Raggio 
01-00658-I