Supreme Court

Case: 10-0953    
10-0953
11/22/2010
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
FORD MOTOR COMPANY 
RICHARD H. GARCIA 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
07/06/2011Reply BriefPetitioner Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Ford Motor Co. (12)
06/21/2011Brief on the MeritsRespondent E-FILED: Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Richard H. Garcia. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
06/01/2011Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner's brief on the merits filed on behalf of Ford Motor Company (orig & 11)
03/11/2011Reply to ResponsePetitioner Petitioner's reply in support of petition for review filed on behalf of Ford Motor Company.  (orig & 11)
02/28/2011Response to PetitionRespondent Response to petition for review filed on behalf of Richard H. Garcia.  (orig & 11)
11/29/2010Appendix FiledPetitioner attached to petition
11/29/2010Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of Ford Motor Co.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/08/2011Oral argument   argued on behalf of petitioner by Michael Eady; argued on behalf of respondents by Isaac Tawil
12/07/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petition was filed in this office on November 29, 2010.
12/06/2010Response to Motion filed  Respondent Richard H. Garcia's Response to Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review. (2)
12/01/2010Call received  From Mr. Tawil to inform the Court that the hard copies of his opposition to pet's m/e/t is on its way.
11/29/2010Appendix Filed  attached to petition
11/29/2010Petition for Review  Petition appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of Ford Motor Co.
11/22/2010Phone call from Clerk's Office  to Mr. Isaac Tawil to inquire whether he is opposed or not to petitioner's motion.  Per Mr. Tawil, he does oppose the motion but he hasn't seen the motion, thus he is going to wait to see the motion in order to respond to it.
11/22/2010Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Motion for extension of time to file Petition for Review. On behalf of Ford Motor Company. (3)
11/16/2011Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  Oral argument submission form submitted by Isaac Tawil of Garcia, Quintanilla & Palacios of McAllen, TX
09/01/2011Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  OA submission form submitted by petitioner attorney Michael Eady of Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP of Austin
08/26/2011Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument Set for oral argument on 12/8/11 @ 9 a.m.; time allotted to argue:  20/20 minutes
08/26/2011Petition for Review granted 
08/26/2011Petition for Review disposedFiling granted
07/06/2011Reply Brief  Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Ford Motor Co. (12)
06/21/2011Brief on the Merits  E-FILED: Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Richard H. Garcia. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
06/01/2011Brief on the Merits  Petitioner's brief on the merits filed on behalf of Ford Motor Company (orig & 11)
05/25/2012Case Stored  G02 Row 21 J-1
05/21/2014Case Stored - stored case location updated  Row 13 G-3
05/10/2012Mandate issued  Mandate & Cost Bill Issued
05/04/2011Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Ford Motor Company's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on the Merits granted.  Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 6/1/11; Response brief due 6/21/11; Reply brief due 7/6/11; mailbox rule does not apply if filing by paper.  Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
05/02/2011Case Record Filed   CLK REC, REPS REC, ANTS BR, APES BR, ANTS REPLY BR, MISC FOLDER, JUDGEMENT,  OPINION (AF)
05/02/2011Phone call from Clerk's Office  Mr. Tawil informed the Court that the motion is unopposed, as long as he received more time also.
05/02/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of time to file Brief on the Merits (2) filed on behalf of Ford Motor Co.
04/05/2011Record Requested in Case 
04/01/2011Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested:  Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 5/2/11; Response brief due 5/23/11; Reply brief due 6/7/11; mailbox rule does not apply if filing by paper
03/30/2012Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
03/30/2012Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed; cause remanded to trial court
03/11/2011Phone call from Clerk's Office  Call made to Mr. Craig Morgan in re:  electronic copy of reply filed 3/11/11.  Left message on voice mail for Mr. Morgan.
03/11/2011Reply to Response  Petitioner's reply in support of petition for review filed on behalf of Ford Motor Company.  (orig & 11)
02/28/2011Response to Petition  Response to petition for review filed on behalf of Richard H. Garcia.  (orig & 11)
01/28/2011Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 2/28/11; mailbox rule does not apply
01/04/2011Case forwarded to Court 
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
05/21/2014Case StoredCase stored.Row 13 G-3
05/25/2012Case StoredCase stored.G02 Row 21 J-1
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Gonzalez, AdelitaOther interested party Mr. Robert E. Ammons
Garcia, Richard H.RespondentMr. Isaac Tawil
Ford Motor CompanyPetitionerMr. Barry Clark Toone
Mr. Michael W. Eady
Mr. Craig A. Morgan
Mr. Jaime Arturo Saenz
Mr. Joseph A. 'Tony' Rodriguez
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed [duplicate 3] 
___ SW3d ___, 10-07-10 
13th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Gina M. Benavides 
Trial Court Information
93rd District Court 
Hidalgo 
Honorable Rodolfo Delgado 
C-2626-07-B