| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 11/29/2010 | Appendix Filed | |
attached to petition
|
|
| 11/29/2010 | Petition for Review | |
Petition appendix attached (12) filed on behalf of James Young.
|
|
| 07/01/2011 | Case Stored | |
Row 19 C3
|
|
| 06/30/2011 | Record returned to Court of Appeals | |
Record returned to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 06/29/2011 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 06/24/2011 | Petition for Review disposed | Dismissed |
|
|
| 06/24/2011 | Motion to dismiss disposed | Filing granted |
Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review granted
|
|
| 06/17/2011 | Motion to dismiss | |
Unopposed motion to dismiss petition pursuant to settlement (2) filed on behalf of James Young, et al.
|
|
| 06/09/2011 | Description of document returned to Supreme Court | |
Letter to respondent, Mr. Dennis Meharchand. Obtained updated address and remailed letter.
|
|
| 05/17/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Joint motion for extension of time to file brief on the merits granted. Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 6/17/11; Response brief due 7/7/11; Reply brief due 7/22/11; mailbox rule does not apply. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 05/16/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
JOINT Motion to Extend Briefing Schedule filed on behalf of Petitioners James Young, et al. AND Respondent Brian Groth. (2)
|
|
| 05/09/2011 | Letter Filed | |
From atty for pet, Mr. Mike Truesdale, advising the Court that he also has gotten returned mail for Mr. Dennis Meharchand. (orig.)
|
|
| 05/03/2011 | Description of document returned to Supreme Court | |
Letter to respondent, Mr. Dennis Meharchand. Returned to sender, moved & unkown. (1)
|
|
| 04/25/2011 | Case Record Filed | |
Inventory in main remarks
|
|
| 04/18/2011 | Record Requested in Case | |
|
|
| 04/18/2011 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Brief on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 5/18/11; Response brief due 6/7/11; Reply brief due 6/22/11; mailbox rule does not apply if filing by paper.
|
|
| 03/30/2011 | Reply to Response | |
E-FILED: Petitioner's Reply to Brian Groh's Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of James Young, et al.
|
|
| 03/16/2011 | Response to Petition | |
Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Brian Groh. (12)
|
|
| 03/15/2011 | Notice received | |
Law firm Jackson Walker LLP advices the Court in regard of respondents representation. This law firm will ONLY be representing Respondent Brian Groh in this proceeeding. However Valt.X Holdings & Dennis L. Meharchand have not retained this law firm to file response. Updated in CMS. (3)
|
|
| 02/14/2011 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 3/16/11; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 01/04/2011 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|