| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/28/2010 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response waiver (2) filed on behalf of Paris ISD.
|
|
| 12/20/2010 | Appendix Filed | |
appendix attached
|
|
| 12/20/2010 | Petition for Review | |
On behalf of Natex Corporation. (12)
|
|
| 10/21/2011 | Petition for Review disposed | Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction |
|
|
| 08/23/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed Motion to File Reply Brief on the Merits granted. Reply brief filed 8/22/11.
|
|
| 08/22/2011 | Reply Brief | |
EFILED Petitioners' Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Natex Corporation d/b/a Natex Corporation Architects (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/22/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
EFILED Unopposed Motion to File Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Natex Corp. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/02/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
E-FILED Respondent's brief on the merits filed on behalf of Paris ISD. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 06/24/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
E-FILED Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Natex Corp. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 06/14/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Call made to petitioner attorney Bryan Rutherford and respondent attorney David Hansen's office to inform them that the motion for extension of time to file briefs on the merits was granted for 30 days instead of the 11 day extension. This way both requests for extensions of time will be granted for both parties instead of treating the motion like two separate extension requests. Mr. Rutherford was ok with the extension but said he will still file his brief on his requested day of 6/24/11.
|
|
| 06/13/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of time to file Brief on the Merits granted. Petitioner's brief due 7/13/11; Response brief due 8/2/11; Reply brief due 8/17/11; mailbox rule does not apply. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 06/13/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
E-FILED Unopposed Motion for Extension of time to file Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Natex Corp. (HARD COPIES RECEIVED)
|
|
| 05/17/2011 | Case Record Filed | |
CLKS REC (4) VOLS, REPS REC, ANTS BR, APES BR, ANTS REPLY BR, MISC FOLDER, JUDGEMENT, OPINION (AF)
|
|
| 05/12/2011 | Record Requested in Case | |
|
|
| 05/12/2011 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Brief on the Merits requested; Petitioner's Brief due 06/13/11; Response Brief due 07/05/11; Reply Brief due 07/20/11 ; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 04/29/2011 | Motion to Strike filed | Denied |
Motion to Strike Reply denied
|
|
| 04/29/2011 | MET to file reply disposed of | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply granted; reply filed 4/12/11
|
|
| 04/18/2011 | Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed | |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply or Alternatively, Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief as Supplemental Brief (incorporated with Response to Motion to Strike) filed on behalf of Natex Corporation d/b/a Natex Corporation Architects. (2)
|
|
| 04/18/2011 | Response to Motion filed | |
Response to Motion to Strike (incorporated with Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply) filed on behalf of Natex Corporation d/b/a Natex Corporation Architects. (2)
|
|
| 04/14/2011 | Call received | |
Mr. Rutherford informed the Court that yesterday he mailed a response to the motion to strike, and a motion for leave to file reply which is essentially a motion to for extension of time.
|
|
| 04/12/2011 | Surreply filed | |
E-FILED: Respondent’s Sur-Reply to Petitioner’s Reply Brief on behalf of Paris ISD (2 hard copies received on 4/13/11)
|
|
| 04/12/2011 | Reply to Response | |
Petition for Review Reply Brief (12) filed on behalf of Natex Corp., et al.
|
|
| 04/11/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Mr. Rutherford informed the Court that he will be filing a Motion to Extend Time to File Reply in response to the Motion to Strike.
|
|
| 04/11/2011 | Motion to Strike filed | |
E-FILED Motion to Strike Reply filed on behalf of Paris Ind. Sch. Dist. HARD COPIES RECEIVED
|
|
| 03/09/2011 | Response to Petition | |
Response to petition for review filed on behalf of Paris I.S.D. (orig & 11)
|
|
| 02/07/2011 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 3/9/11; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 02/02/2011 | Notice from attorney regarding vacation dates | |
Mr. Rutherford's vacation notice: March 14-18, 2011, and October 10-17, 2011 (1) filed on behalf of Natex Corp.
|
|
| 01/31/2012 | Case Stored | |
Row 20 H-3
|
|
| 01/25/2012 | Record returned to Court of Appeals | |
RECORD RETURNED TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
|
|
| 01/25/2012 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
CERTIFIED COPY OF NOTICE SENT TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
|
|
| 01/04/2011 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|