Supreme Court

Case: 11-0366    
11-0366
05/18/2011
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. AND DIXIE PIPELINE COMPANY 
CATHERINE MITCHELL, ET AL. 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
05/31/2012Reply BriefPetitioner Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. and Dixie Pipeline Company.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
04/16/2012Brief on the MeritsRespondent Respondents Catherine Mitchell, et al.'s Response Brief on the Merits.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
02/16/2012Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. and Dixie Pipeline Company.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
10/24/2011Reply to ResponsePetitioner E-FILED  Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, LP. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
10/07/2011Response to PetitionRespondent E-FILED  Response to Petition for Review. On behalf of Catherine Mitchell, et al.  HARD COPIES RECEIVED.
06/22/2011Appendix FiledPetitioner E-FILED  appendix attached
06/22/2011Petition for ReviewPetitioner E-FILED  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, LP., et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/30/2011Case Record Filed   Electronic Record from the 1st Court of Appeals Received.
12/19/2011Record Requested in Case 
12/16/2011Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief due 1/17/12; Response brief due 2/6/12; Reply brief due 2/21/12
12/04/2012Oral argument   argued on behalf of petitioners by David M. Gunn and Murray Fogler; argued on behalf of respondents by Richard P. Hogan, Jr. (Justice Guzman not sitting)
10/25/2013Case Stored  G02 Row 22 F-2
10/24/2011Reply to Response  E-FILED  Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, LP. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
10/07/2011Response to Petition  E-FILED  Response to Petition for Review. On behalf of Catherine Mitchell, et al.  HARD COPIES RECEIVED.
10/05/2011Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Response is due October 7, 2011. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE CONSIDERED
09/29/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  E-FILED  2nd unopposed motion for extension of time to file response to petition for review. On behalf of Catherine Mitchell, Individually, et al.
09/21/2012Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  Oral Argument Submission Form submitted by petitioner attorney David M. Gunn and Murray Fogler of Beck, Redden & Secrest, L.L.P. of Houston, Tx
09/20/2013Cause Reinstated disposedDismissed
09/20/2013cause reinstated to active docket 
09/20/2013Abatement Order Lifted  Abatement order issued May 17, 2013 is lifted
09/20/2013Motion to dismiss disposedFiling granted Agreed Motion to Dismiss granted
09/18/2012Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  Oral argument submission form submitted by respondent attorney Richard P. Hogan Jr. from Hogan & Hogan, Houston, TX.
09/12/2013Motion to dismiss  Joint Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, et al.,  petitioners, and Catherine Mitchell, et al, respondents.
08/24/2011Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Response is due 09/30/11; due n/l/t 3:00 p.m.; mlbx rule d/n/a. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE DISFAVORED.
08/22/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed motion for extension of time to file response to petition (2) filed on behalf of Catherine Mitchell.
08/17/2012Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument This case is set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m. on December 4, 2012.  Time allotted to argue:  20/20 minutes. (Justice Guzman not sitting)
08/17/2012Petition for Review disposedFiling granted
08/17/2012Petition for Review granted 
08/02/2013Order of the Court IssuedMatter in Supreme Court of Texas Abated The Court's abatement order of May 17, 2013 expired by its own terms on July 16, 2013.  The abatement is extended until October 1, 2013 by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.
07/29/2011Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 8/29/11; mailbox rule does not apply
07/22/2013Status report filed  Joint Status Report filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, LP and Catherine Mitchell, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
07/19/2011Case forwarded to Court 
07/13/2011Response Waiver filed  E-FILED  Respondents Catherine Mitchell, et al.'s Response Waiver (HARD COPIES REC'D)
06/28/2013Status Report requested  Status Report due no later than July 22, 2013.
06/22/2011Appendix Filed  E-FILED  appendix attached
06/22/2011Petition for Review  E-FILED  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, LP., et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
05/31/2012Reply Brief  Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. and Dixie Pipeline Company.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
05/19/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petition is due June 22, 2011.
05/18/2011Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  E-FILED  Unopposed motion for extension of time to file petition for review filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners LP.  HARD COPIES RECEIVED
05/17/2013Petition for Review disposedMatter in Supreme Court of Texas Abated This case is removed from the Court's active docket until July 16, 2013, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.
05/17/2013Order of the Court IssuedMatter in Supreme Court of Texas Abated This case is removed from the Court's active docket until July 16, 2013, by which time the parties must file either a status report or a motion to dismiss.
05/17/2013Motion to Abate disposedFiling granted Joint Motion to Abate granted
05/16/2014Case Stored - stored case location updated  Row 10 H-1
05/06/2013Motion to Abate filed  Joint Motion to Abate filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, LP and Catherine Mitchell.
04/27/2012Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Pet's Reply Brief is due May 31, 2012. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED
04/26/2013Call received  Call received from attorneys Richard Hogan and David Gunn to inform the Court that there is a pending settlement agreement.  Parties intend on filing a motion to abate by next week.
04/24/2012Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Petitioners Enterprise Products Partners, L.P., et al.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to file Reply Brief on the Merits.
04/16/2012Brief on the Merits  Respondents Catherine Mitchell, et al.'s Response Brief on the Merits.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
03/30/2012Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Response brief due 04/16/12; Reply brief due 05/01/12; NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE CONSIDERED.
03/30/2012Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief on the Merits filed on bwehalf of Catherine Mitchell, et al.
03/05/2012Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Response brief due 04/02/12; Reply brief due 04/17/12; FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
03/05/2012Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Catherine Mitchell, et al.
02/16/2012Brief on the Merits  Petitioner Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. and Dixie Pipeline Company.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
01/18/2012Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Motion for Extension of Time is granted.  Petitioner's Brief is due February 16, 2012; Respondent's Brief is due March 7, 2012; Reply Brief on the Merits is due March 22, 2012.  FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
01/13/2012Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Enterprise Products Partners, LP.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
05/16/2014Case StoredCase stored.Row 10 H-1
10/25/2013Case StoredCase stored.G02 Row 22 F-2
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Mitchell, CatherineRespondentMr. Nick C. Nichols
Mr. Matthew E. Coveler
Ms. Jennifer Bruch Hogan
Mr. Richard P. Hogan Jr.
Mr. Bernardino Agosto Jr.
Mr. Daniel Horowitz III
Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.PetitionerMs. Harriet O'Neill
Mr. John S. Adcock
Mr. Murray J. Fogler
Mr. Fields Alexander
Mr. David Gunn
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed  
340 SW3d 476, 02-10-11 
1st Court of Appeals 
Honorable Evelyn Keyes 
Trial Court Information
55th District Court 
Harris 
Honorable Dion C. Ramos 
2008-35840