| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 10/27/2011 | Case Stored | |
Row 19 H-3
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Call made to parties to inform them that motion for stay and the petition for writ of mandamus are denied; left messages
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Motion to Stay Disposed | Denied |
Motion to Stay Trial of Custody Suit denied
|
|
| 08/23/2011 | Call received | |
From Ms. Ruth Vernier, atty for relator, inquiring about the status of her motion to stay and pet/writ of mandamus. I told her that it was still pending.
|
|
| 08/12/2011 | Response to Motion filed | |
E-FILED: Response to Motion to Stay filed on behalf of Michelle Berezowsky.
|
|
| 08/09/2011 | Motion to Stay Filed | |
E-FILED: Motion to Stay Trial of Custody Suit filed on behalf of Pablo Angel Rendon Ojeda. (HARD COPIES RECEIVED)
|
|
| 08/09/2011 | Reply to Response | |
E-FILED: Relator's Reply to Response filed on behalf of Pablo Angel Rendon Ojeda. (HARD COPIES RECEIVED)
|
|
| 08/02/2011 | Call received | |
From Ms. Ruth Vernier's office (her asst. Debbie Murphy) to inform the Court that they will be filing a reply to rlp resp to mand by no later than August 9, 2011.
|
|
| 08/01/2011 | Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed | |
EFILED Michelle Berezowsky Gomez's Response to Relator, Pablo Angel Rendon Ojeda's Petition for Writ of Mandamus (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/01/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response granted. Response to petition for writ of mandamus was filed 8/1/11.
|
|
| 08/01/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
EFILED First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response filed on behalf of Michelle Berezowsky Gomez
|
|
| 07/28/2011 | Letter Filed | |
EFILED Letter from real party attorney for Maria Isabel Gomez Lopez and Fernando Berezowsky Olaeta, Bradford Atkinson, informing the Court the Court that his clients were not parties to the suit at the time of the hearings upon which the petition for writ of mandamus is based occured. To the extent the Court is requesting our current legal views on the petition for writ of mandamus, his clients fully support the arguments propounded by Michelle Berezowsky Gomez in her response. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 07/19/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Call made to real parties attorneys, Bradford Atkinson and Robert Rosenquist, to request responses to petition for writ of mandamus.
|
|
| 07/18/2011 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for writ of mandamus due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 7/28/11; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 07/01/2011 | Appendix Filed | |
appendix attached to petition
|
|
| 07/01/2011 | Case Record Filed | |
Mandamus Record (1) filed on behalf of Pablo Angel Rendon Ojeda.
|
|
| 07/01/2011 | Court reporter/recorder's record | |
Reporter's Record (4v; one copy of each) "this record is also for case 09-10-446-CV - Sup Ct. #11-0505 " filed on behalf of Pablo Angel Rendon Ojeda.
|
|
| 07/01/2011 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed | |
On behalf of Pablo Angel Rendon Ojeda. (12)
|
|