| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 10/28/2011 | Case Stored | |
Row 19 H-4
|
|
| 10/24/2011 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 10/14/2011 | Abatement Order Lifted | |
Abatement Order Issued September 9, 2011 lifted.
|
|
| 10/14/2011 | Petition for Review disposed | Dismissed |
|
|
| 10/14/2011 | Motion to dismiss disposed | Filing granted |
motion to dismiss petition for review granted
|
|
| 10/07/2011 | Motion to dismiss | |
E-FILED Petitioner AMS Construction Company, Inc. d/b/a AMS Staff Leasing's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss its Petition for Review.
|
|
| 09/09/2011 | Order of the Court Issued | Matter in Supreme Court of Texas Abated |
|
|
| 09/09/2011 | Petition for Review disposed | Matter in Supreme Court of Texas Abated |
|
|
| 09/09/2011 | Motion to Abate disposed | Filing granted |
Amended Motion to Abate granted
|
|
| 09/02/2011 | Certification (various) in case received | |
E-FILED Petitioner AMS Construction Company, Inc.'s Certificate of Conference to Petitioner's Amended Request for Relief (Motion to Abate). (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 09/01/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
to Ms. Liberato's Assistant, Michelle Meuhlen to request the Certificate of Conference to Motion to Abate.
|
|
| 09/01/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
to Ms. Liberato's Assistant, Michelle Meuhlen, to inquire whether their 'Amended Request for Relief' that is incorporated with Reply to Response to Motion it is an actual Motion. Per Ms. Meuhlen, yes it is a motion because they are asking us to abate this appeal.
|
|
| 09/01/2011 | Motion to Abate filed | |
E-FILED Petitioner AMS Construction Company, Inc.'s Motion to Abate titled as Amended Request for Relief (INCORPORATED w/Reply to Respondent's Response to Motion to Grant Petition).
|
|
| 09/01/2011 | Reply to Response to Motion | |
E-FILED Petitioner AMS Construction Company, Inc.'s Reply to Respondent's Response to Motion to Grant Petition (INCORPORATED w/ "Amended Request for Relief"). (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/31/2011 | Response to Motion filed | |
E-FILED: Response to Unopposed Motion to Grant Petition for Review Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 56.3 filed on behalf of K.H.K. Scaffolding, Houston, Inc. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/25/2011 | Miscellaneous Motion | |
E-FILED Petitioner, AMS Construction Company, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Grant Petition for Review under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 56.3 (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/23/2011 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 08/18/2011 | Response Waiver filed | |
E-FILED: Response Waiver filed on behalf of KHK Scaffolding Houston, Inc..
|
|
| 08/10/2011 | Appendix Filed | |
E-FILED: Appendix attached.
|
|
| 08/10/2011 | Petition for Review | |
E-FILED: Petition for Review filed on behalf of AMS Construction Company, Inc. d/b/a AMS Staff Leasing.
|
|
| 07/12/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
Petition is due August 10, 2011.
|
|
| 07/08/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | |
E-FILED Unopposed motion for extension of time to file petition for review filed on behalf of AMS Construction Co. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|