Supreme Court

Case: 11-0773    
11-0773
09/28/2011
Petition for Review/Cause under Rule 53.1
BIODERM SKIN CARE, LLC AND QUAN NGUYEN, M.D. 
VEASNA “SANDEE” SOK 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
02/15/2013Petition Reinstated 
02/05/2013Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filedPetitioner Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing.
12/31/2012Response to Motion for RehearingRespondent Response to Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Respondent.
11/12/2012Motion for RehearingRehearing filed in Petition for Review Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC.
09/27/2012Reply BriefPetitioner Petitioners Bioderm Skin Care, LLC, et al.'s Reply Brief on the Merits.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
09/13/2012Brief on the MeritsRespondent Respondent's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Vaesna 'Sandee' Sok.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
07/23/2012Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC and Quan Nguyen.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
06/05/2012Reply to ResponsePetitioner Reply to Response to Petition for Review. On behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, L.L.C., et al.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
05/21/2012Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Veasna "Sandee" Sok.
09/29/2011Supplemental appendix Petitioner E-FILED: Supplemental Appendix to Petition for Review: Court of Appeals Judgment filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
09/28/2011Appendix FiledPetitioner E-FILED Attached to petition
09/28/2011Petition for ReviewPetitioner E-FILED  Petition appendix attached filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/31/2012Response to Motion for Rehearing  Response to Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Respondent.
12/14/2012Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to motion for rehearing due no later than 12/31/12.
12/02/2011Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to petition for review due no later than 1/2/2012.
11/13/2012Case forwarded to Court 
11/12/2012Motion for Rehearing  Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC.
11/01/2011Case forwarded to Court 
10/26/2012Petition for Review disposedDenied
09/29/2011Supplemental appendix   E-FILED: Supplemental Appendix to Petition for Review: Court of Appeals Judgment filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
09/28/2011Appendix Filed  E-FILED Attached to petition
09/28/2011Petition for Review  E-FILED  Petition appendix attached filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
09/27/2012Reply Brief  Petitioners Bioderm Skin Care, LLC, et al.'s Reply Brief on the Merits.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
09/13/2012Brief on the Merits  Respondent's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Vaesna 'Sandee' Sok.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
09/09/2013Oral argument   Argued on behalf of Petitioners by R. Brent Cooper; Argued on behalf of Respondents by Coury M. Jacocks (Chief Justice Jefferson not sitting)
09/06/2013Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  Oral argument submission form submitted by respondent attorney Coury M. Jacocks  of Law Offices of Coury M. Jacocks of Addison.
09/06/2013Phone call from Clerk's Office  Contacted respondent attorney Coury Jacocks to request the oral argument submission form on behalf of respondent.  Left voicemail and sent email.
09/06/2012Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Response brief due 09/12/12; Reply brief due 09/27/12; FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
08/29/2013Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received  Oral argument submission form submitted by petitioners attorney R. Brent Cooper of Cooper & Scully, P.C of Dallas, TX
08/28/2012Response to Motion filed  Response to Motion for Extension of Time to File Respondent's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care.
08/27/2012Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Veasna "Sandee" Sok.
08/16/2012Phone call from Clerk's Office  Spoke with Mr. Jacouks.  He informed the Court that he thought the due date was August 20, 2012 for the Respondent's Brief on the Merits.  He will file a motion for extension of time.
07/23/2012Brief on the Merits  Petitioner Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, LLC and Quan Nguyen.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
07/18/2012Case Record Filed   Electronic Appellate Record received from the 5th Court of Appeals.
07/11/2014Case Stored  G02 Row 29 C-3
06/22/2012Record Requested in Case 
06/22/2012Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested:  Petitioner's brief due no later than 7/23/12; Response brief due 8/13/12; Reply brief due 8/28/12
06/05/2012Reply to Response  Reply to Response to Petition for Review. On behalf of Bioderm Skin Care, L.L.C., et al.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
05/21/2012Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Veasna "Sandee" Sok.
05/09/2014Mandate issued  Mandate & Cost Bill Issued
05/08/2012Designation of Lead Counsel   Petitioner's Notice of Appearance and Designation of Lead Counsel as Mr. Diana L. Faust and R. Brent Cooper, Cooper & Scully, P.C., 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100, Telephone: (214) 712-9500.
05/03/2013Case set for oral argumentCase set for oral argument This cause has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., September 9, 2013.  Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes
04/20/2012Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted in part Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Review granted (in part).  Requested response due 5/21/12, not 5/31/12 per request.  NO further requests for extensions of time will be considered.
04/20/2012Call received  Call received from Caroline Block of Fraley & Fraley, LLP who said they are unopposed to the extension of time filed by respondent attorney.  
04/19/2012Phone call from Clerk's Office  Call made to petitioner attorney, Liz Fraley, to ask if a response to the motion for extension of time is forthcoming.  Let voicemail.
04/19/2012Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Motion to Extend Time to File Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Veasna "Sandee" Sok
04/17/2012Phone call from Clerk's Office  Call made to Coury Jacocks to request emailed version of motion for extension of time.  Filing fee has been received without the hard copy of the motion.
04/05/2012Call received  Call received from respondent attorney Coury Jacocks letting us know a motion for extension of time is being mailed in instead of e-filed.  Mr. Jacocks stated he can not use his current attorney firm's resources to e-file and that is why he is sending in the hard copy of the motion.  He did not include a filing fee so I explained that he needs to send the fee soon otherwise he will be getting another call.
04/05/2012Phone call from Clerk's Office  Call made to respondent attorney Coury Jacocks to find out status of motion for extension of time (per call on 1/6/12) and response.  Mr. Jacocks expressed that he no longer has his own law firm and has changed jobs since then.  He stated he no longer represents respondent however he is not going to file motion to withdraw.  He will look for appellate counsel to appear on respondent's behalf.
03/28/2014Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
03/28/2014Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed; cause remanded to trial court The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. Justice Guzman delivered the opinion of the Court.  
(3/28/2014 10:43:46 AM) 11-0773.jmt.pdf, 110773.pdf
02/15/2013Petition for Review granted 
02/15/2013Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Date and time of oral argument are yet to be determined.
02/15/2013Petition Reinstated 
02/15/2013Motion for Rehearing - DisposedFiling granted
02/15/2013Previous Order of the Court withdrawn  denial of petition for review on October 26, 2012, withdrawn
02/05/2013Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filed  Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing.
02/03/2012Phone call from Clerk's Office  To Mr. Coury Matthews Jacocks office:  left message on voice mail for a call back in re:  the motion for extension of time that he was going to file.
01/06/2012Call received  From respondent's atty, Mr. Coury Jacocks to inform the Court that we have an incorrect address on him and he has not gotten the letter from the Court requesting that he file a response to pet/rev.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
07/11/2014Case StoredCase stored.G02 Row 29 C-3
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Sok, Vaesna SandeeRespondentMr. Matthew Sharp
Mr. Coury Matthews Jacocks
Bioderm Skin Care, LLCPetitionerMr. R. Brent Cooper
Ms. Elizabeth M. Fraley
Ms. Diana L. Faust
Mr. Richard Clark Harrist
Mr. Kyle M. Burke  
Ms. Caroline Clore Block
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed  
345 SW3d 189, 06-28-11 
5th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Kerry P. FitzGerald 
Trial Court Information
160th District Court 
Dallas 
Honorable James R. Jordan 
DC-09-08815