| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/28/2011 | Reply to Response | |
E-FILED: Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of The City of Houston, Texas. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 12/27/2011 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 12/15/2011 | Response to Petition | |
E-FILED Response to Petition for Review. On behalf of Roger Bates, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 12/04/2012 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | |
Oral argument submission form submitted by petitioner attorney Reagan D. Pratt of The Pratt Law Firm, PLLC of Houston, TX
|
|
| 11/30/2011 | Appendix Filed | |
E-FILED appendix attached
|
|
| 11/30/2011 | Petition for Review | |
E-FILED Petition for Review filed on behalf of The City of Houston. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 11/26/2012 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | |
Oral Argument will be presented by Vincent Lee Marable, III of Paul Webb, P.C. of Wharton, TX
|
|
| 11/16/2011 | Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time granted. Petition for Review is due November 30, 2011. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will be disfavored.
|
|
| 11/14/2011 | Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | |
E-FILED Third Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of The City of Houston.
|
|
| 10/14/2011 | Corrected Notice sent to all counsel | |
Corrected notice sent to parties to update the petition for review due date to 11/16/11 (not 11/30/11).
|
|
| 10/14/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Call made to Vincent Marable III to ask if he is unopposed to the original request by petitioner for a 47 day extension of time to file petition for review. Mr. Marable is not opposed to the 47 day extension. Corrected notices will be mailed out to parties to move due date to 11/16/11 (not 11/30/11).
Treated amended motion for extension of time as a second motion for extension of time to file petition for review.
|
|
| 10/13/2011 | Letter Filed | |
Letter from Vincent Marable III bringing to the attention of the Clerk that there appears to be some type of internal miscalculation in calendaring the extension of time sought by petitioner. Petitioner was given a total of 60 days to file petition for review when their amended motion requested a total of 47 days to file the petition.
|
|
| 10/04/2011 | Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
Petition for review is due November 30, 2011. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
|
|
| 10/04/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Mr. Marable informed the Court that the second motion is unopposed.
|
|
| 10/04/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
Petition is due October 31, 2011.
|
|
| 10/04/2011 | Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | |
E-FILED Amended Motion for Extend Time to file Petition for Review filed as a second motion for extension. Filed on behalf of The City of Houston.
|
|
| 10/03/2011 | Call received | |
From respondent's atty's office to inform the Court that they will not be filing a response to the m/e/t and they are NOT opposed to the motion.
|
|
| 09/30/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Left message for respondent attorneys to inform whether they will file a response to motion by 10/06/11.
|
|
| 09/30/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed | |
E-FILED: Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed on behalf of The City of Houston. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 09/26/2013 | Case Stored | |
G02 Row 22 H-1
|
|
| 09/21/2012 | Case set for oral argument | Case set for oral argument |
This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., January 9, 2013. (Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes)
|
|
| 09/21/2012 | Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
|
|
| 09/21/2012 | Petition for Review granted | |
|
|
| 08/02/2013 | Mandate issued | |
Mandate & Cost Bill Issued
|
|
| 08/02/2013 | Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. | Filing granted |
Joint Motion to Expedite Issuance of Mandate granted
|
|
| 07/24/2013 | Motion to Expedite Filed | |
Joint Motion to Expedite the Issuance of the Mandate filed on behalf of the City of HOuston and Roger Bates, et al.
|
|
| 06/28/2013 | Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of record | Issued |
|
|
| 06/28/2013 | Concurring and Dissenting Opinion delivered | Issued |
Justice Guzman delivered an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Boyd joined.
|
|
| 06/28/2013 | Concurring and Dissenting Opinion delivered | Issued |
Justice Hecht filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Lehrmann joined.
|
|
| 06/28/2013 | Opinion issued | Court affirms in part, reverses in part and renders court of appeals' judgment |
Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Johnson, Justice Willett, and Justice Devine joined; in which Justice Hecht and Justice Lehrmann joined as to Parts I and II.A; and in which Justice Guzman and Justice Boyd joined as to Parts I and II.B.
(6/28/2013 10:55:19 AM) 110778cd2.pdf, 110778cd.pdf, 110778.pdf, 11-0778.jmt.pdf
|
|
| 05/25/2012 | Reply Brief | |
Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits. On behalf of City of Houston. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 05/16/2014 | Case Stored - stored case location updated | |
Row 7 A-3
|
|
| 05/10/2012 | Brief on the Merits | |
Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Roger Bates, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 04/20/2012 | Brief on the Merits | |
Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of the City of Houston, Texas. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 04/18/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Petitioner brief due 04/20/12; Response brief due 05/10/12; Reply brief due 05/25/12; NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WILL BE CONSIDERED.
|
|
| 04/18/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Petitioner Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of the City of Houston, Texas.
|
|
| 03/19/2012 | Case Record Filed | |
Electronic Appellate Record received from the 14th Court of Appeals
|
|
| 03/14/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Petitioner's Brief is due April 18, 2012; Respondent's Brief is due May 8, 2012; Reply Brief is due May 23, 2012. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
|
|
| 03/14/2012 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Mr. Marable informed the Court that the Motion for Extension of Time is unopposed.
|
|
| 03/09/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief filed on behalf of the City of Houston, et al.
|
|
| 02/22/2012 | Record Requested in Case | |
|
|
| 02/17/2012 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Petitioner brief due 03/19/12; Response brief due 04/09/12; Reply brief due 04/24/12
|
|
| 01/15/2013 | Post submission brief filed | |
Post Submission Brief filed on behalf of City of Houston. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 01/11/2013 | Post submission brief filed | |
Post-Submission Letter Brief on behalf of Roger Bates, et al.
|
|
| 01/09/2013 | Oral argument | |
argued on behalf of petitioner by Reagan D. Pratt; argued on behalf of Vincent Lee Marable III
|
|