| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/21/2011 | Supplemental Letter Brief | |
E-FILED Respondent Austin Commercial Contractors LP's Supplemental Letter Brief. On behalf of Respondent highlighting two recent opinions this court has issued: (1) In re Service Corp. Int'l, No. 10-0155 (Tex. Dec. 16, 2011), and (2) In re Service Corp. Int'l, No. 10-0158 (Tex. Dec. 16, 2011). (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 12/09/2011 | Reply to Response | |
E-FILED Petitioner Carter & Burgess, Inc.'s Reply to Response to Petition for Review. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 11/29/2011 | Response to Petition | |
EFILED Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Austin Commercial Contractors, LP. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 11/29/2011 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 11/18/2011 | Motion to Stay Disposed | Denied |
motion for stay denied
|
|
| 11/15/2011 | Miscellaneous Motion | |
E-FILED Respondent Austin Commercial Contractors LP's Unopposed Motion to Administer Case as Original Proceeding.
|
|
| 10/28/2011 | Reply to Response to Motion | |
E-FILED Petitioner Carter & Burgess, Inc.'s Reply to Response to Motion for Stay.
|
|
| 10/27/2011 | Response to Motion filed | |
E-FILED: Response to Motion to Stay filed on behalf of Austin Commercial Contractors, Inc. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 10/25/2011 | Motion to Stay Filed | |
E-FILED: Emergency Motion to Stay filed on behalf of Carter & Burgess, Inc.
|
|
| 10/25/2011 | Appendix Filed | |
Appendix attached.
|
|
| 10/25/2011 | Petition for Review | |
E-FILED: Petition for Review filed on behalf of Carter & Burgess, Inc. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 07/02/2012 | Case Stored | |
Row 21 I-4
|
|
| 06/22/2012 | Record returned to Court of Appeals | |
Record returned to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 06/22/2012 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 05/21/2014 | Case Stored - stored case location updated | |
Row 12 A-3
|
|
| 05/11/2012 | Petition for Review disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 05/11/2012 | Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. | Denied |
Respondent Austin Commercial Contractors LP's Unopposed Motion to Administer Case as Original Proceeding denied
|
|
| 04/10/2012 | Reply Brief | |
Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Carter & Burgess, Inc. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 03/30/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Reply brief is due 04/10/12; FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
|
|
| 03/27/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
E-FILED Petitioner Carter & Burgess, Inc.'s Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply Brief.
|
|
| 03/20/2012 | Corrected Brief | |
CORRECTED Brief on the Merits of Respondent Austin Commercial Contractors Inc. (On the initial submission, counsel had technical problems with the appendix, so he e-Filed this corrected version instead) (HC REC'D)
|
|
| 03/19/2012 | Brief on the Merits | |
Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Austin Commercial Contractors, Inc.
|
|
| 03/01/2012 | Sealed document filed in case | |
Rec'd (4) yellow manila envelopes titled " Confidential Documents under Seal - Appendix 8). Documents were sent to our Court by pet's atty, Mr. Andrew Keetch wtih Cantey Hanger LLP
|
|
| 02/27/2012 | Brief on the Merits | |
E-FILED Petitioner Carter & Burgess, Inc.'s Brief on the Merits. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 02/16/2012 | Case Record Filed | |
Clerk's record (1V), supp clk's record (1V), ant's br, ape's br, ant's reply br, ape's mo/re, ape's sur-reply br, ant's reply br, ape's post-sub brief, ACCLP's reply to Carter & Burgess's sur-reply, real party in interest response to pet/writ of mandamus, misc. folders (3 folders, misc. mos, corres. & orders), judgment (2), opinion (5)
|
|
| 01/31/2012 | Record Requested in Case | |
|
|
| 01/27/2012 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Brief on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief due 2/27/12; Response brief due 3/19/12; Reply brief due 4/3/12
|
|