Supreme Court

Case: 13-0615    
13-0615
08/09/2013
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
RUKMI INDAH IDNIARTI, ET AL. 
BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC., ET AL. 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/24/2013Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition filed on behalf of Bell Helicoper Textron, Inc.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
10/10/2013Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of Rukmi Indah Idniarti, et al. (Hard Copies Recieved)
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/06/2013Petition for Review disposedDenied
10/29/2013Case forwarded to Court 
10/24/2013Response to Petition  Response to Petition filed on behalf of Bell Helicoper Textron, Inc.  (HARD COPIES REC'D)
10/10/2013Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Rukmi Indah Idniarti, et al. (Hard Copies Recieved)
09/27/2013Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review is Granted. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored. Petition for Review is due October 11, 2013.
09/26/2013Response to Motion filed  Response to Petitioners' 2nd Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review. On behalf of Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., et al.
09/25/2013Phone call from Clerk's Office  Spoke with Bryan David in regards to their opposition to petitioner's second motion for extension of time to file petition for review. He stated that they will file a written response by Monday, September 30, 2013.
09/25/2013Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Opposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Rukmi Indah Idniarti, et al.
08/13/2013Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petition is due September 26, 2013. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
08/09/2013Response to Motion filed  Response in opposition to Motion for Extension of Time filed on behalf of Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., et al.
08/09/2013Phone call from Clerk's Office  to respondent's counsel, Mr. David, to inquire whether he intend to file a response to petitioner's motion to indicate his opposition. He said that he hasn't seen the motion yet, but will call back as soon as he look at the motion, and will let us know if a response will be filed or not.
08/09/2013Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review. On behalf of Rukmi Indah Idniarti, et al.
01/27/2014Case Stored  Row 20 C-4
01/16/2014Notice sent to Court of Appeals 
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
01/27/2014Case StoredCase stored.Row 20 C-4
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.RespondentMr. Charles H. Smith
Mr. Bryan Scott David
Idniarti, Rukmi IndahPetitionerMr. Newton B. Schwartz Sr.
Mr. C. Benton Musslewhite
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed  
___SW3d___, 05-09-13 
2nd Court of Appeals 
Honorable Bob McCoy 
Trial Court Information
153rd District Court 
Tarrant 
Honorable Ken Curry 
153-197338-03