Supreme Court

Case: 13-0907    
13-0907
11/14/2013
Petition for Review/Cause under Tex. R. App. P. 59.1
RICHMONT HOLDINGS, INC., NUKOTE HOLDING, INC., NUKOTE INTERNATIONAL, INC., INKBRARY, L.L.C., SUPERIOR ACQUISITIONS L.L.C., JOHN P. ROCHON, SR., JOHN P. ROCHON, JR., KELLY KITTRELL, RUSSELL MACK, C & R SERVICES, INC. AND KENNETH R. SCHLAG 
SUPERIOR RECHARGE SYSTEMS, L.L.C. AND JON BLAKE 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
01/05/2015Motion for RehearingMotion for Rehearing Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Superior Recharge Systems, LLC, et al.
05/27/2014Reply BriefPetitioner Petitioners' Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Richmont Holdings Inc., et al.
05/08/2014Brief on the MeritsRespondent Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Superior Recharge Systems.
04/22/2014Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Richmont Holdings, Inc., et al.
01/16/2014Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Superior Recharge Systems, L.L.C.
12/18/2013Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of Richmont Holdings, Inc.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/19/2014Motion to strike disposedFiling dismissed as moot Motion to Strike Respondents' References to Evidence Outside the Record dismissed as moot.
12/19/2014Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
12/19/2014Opinion issuedCourt of Appeals' judgment reversed; cause remanded to trial court Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.  Per Curiam Opinion
12/19/2014Petition for Review disposedPetition granted pursuant to TRAP 59.1
12/19/2014Petition for Review granted under TRAP 59.1 
12/18/2013Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Richmont Holdings, Inc.
11/22/2013Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Petition is due December 18, 2013.
11/21/2013Call received  From Mr. Colbert to inform the Court that they ARE OPPOSED to the motion for extension of time of petitioner. They will not file a response unless the Court requests one from them.
11/21/2013Phone call from Clerk's Office  call made to Mr Colbert to inquire whether respondent is opposed or unopposed to petitioner's motion to extend time. Left message, and requested call back.
11/19/2013Call received  Per Mr. Doody, he didn't realize that his motion was rejected, and will resubmit as soon as he can.
11/19/2013Electronic communication sent to Party  to Attorney Mr. Doody to inquire the status of his motion to extend time.
11/14/2013Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review. On behalf of Richmont Holdings, Inc., et al.
05/27/2014Motion to Strike filed  Motion to Strike Respondents’ References to Evidence Outside the Record filed on behalf of Richmont Holdings Inc., et al.
05/27/2014Reply Brief  Petitioners' Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Richmont Holdings Inc., et al.
05/18/2015Case Stored  G02 Row 14 F-4
05/08/2014Brief on the Merits  Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Superior Recharge Systems.
04/22/2014Brief on the Merits  Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Richmont Holdings, Inc., et al.
03/27/2014Case Record Filed   Clerk's record (3 V), reporter's record (3 V in one w/disk), ant's br, supplemental appendix to ant's br, ape's br, ant's reply br, ant's mo/re w/order, judgment on remand, opinion on remand
03/25/2014Record Requested in Case  Record requested from the 2nd COA
03/21/2014Brief on the Merits Ordered  Brief on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief due no later than 4/21/14; Response brief due 5/12/14; Reply brief due 5/27/14
03/13/2015Mandate issued  Mandate & Cost Bill Issued
03/13/2015Motion for Rehearing - DisposedDenied
01/21/2014Case forwarded to Court 
01/16/2014Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Superior Recharge Systems, L.L.C.
01/05/2015Motion for Rehearing  Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Superior Recharge Systems, LLC, et al.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
05/18/2015Case StoredCase stored.G02 Row 14 F-4
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Richmont Holdings Inc.PetitionerMr. Scott Ryan Doody
Superior Recharge System L.L.C.RespondentMr. Stephen D. Colbert
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed  
453 SW3d 443, 08-22-13 
2nd Court of Appeals 
Honorable LeeAnn Dauphinot 
Trial Court Information
211th District Court 
Denton 
Honorable Lawrence Dee Shipman 
2008-30173-211