| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 09/11/2015 | Mandate issued | |
Mandate & Cost Bill Issued
|
|
| 09/11/2015 | Motion for Rehearing - Disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 07/31/2015 | Designation of Lead Counsel | |
Notice of Lead Counsel filed on behalf of Randoll Mill Pharmacy.
|
|
| 06/29/2015 | Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filed | |
Reply to Response to Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Stacey Miller, et al.
|
|
| 06/22/2015 | Response to Motion for Rehearing | |
Response to Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Randoll Mill Phamarcy, et al.
|
|
| 06/05/2015 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to motion for rehearing due no later than June 22, 2015.
|
|
| 05/11/2015 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 05/11/2015 | Motion for Rehearing | |
Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Stacey Miller, et al.
|
|
| 04/24/2015 | Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of record | Issued |
|
|
| 04/24/2015 | Opinion issued | Court of Appeals' judgment reversed; cause remanded to trial court |
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. Justice Lehrmann delivered the opinion of the Court.
(4/24/2015 3:02:42 PM) 13-1014.jmt.pdf, 131014.pdf
|
|
| 01/14/2015 | Oral argument | |
Argued on behalf of petitioners by Erin E. Lunceford; argued on behalf of respondents by Greg Fitzgerald
|
|
| 11/25/2014 | Letter Filed | |
Letter received to notify the Court of Respondent's updated Oral Argument Submission Form.
|
|
| 11/25/2014 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | |
Oral Argument will be presented by Greg Fitzgerald on behalf of respondents Stacy Miller and Randy Miller.
|
|
| 11/24/2014 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | |
Oral Argument will be presented by Erin E. Lunceford of Sprott Newsom Lunceford Quattlebaum Messenger of Houston Texas. On behalf of petitioners Randoll Mill Pharmacy, et al.
|
|
| 10/24/2014 | Case set for oral argument | Case set for oral argument |
This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., January 14, 2015. Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes
|
|
| 10/24/2014 | Petition for Review disposed | Filing granted |
|
|
| 10/24/2014 | Petition for Review granted | |
|
|
| 10/24/2014 | Motion to strike disposed | Denied |
Respondents' Motion to Strike or Return Amicus Curiae Brief denied
|
|
| 10/17/2014 | Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks. | Filing dismissed as moot |
Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to Petition for Review dismissed as moot.
|
|
| 09/19/2014 | Reply Brief | |
Reply brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Randoll Mill Pharmacy, et al.
|
|
| 09/05/2014 | Brief on the Merits | |
Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Stacey and Randy Miller.
|
|
| 09/05/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Respondent's Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief on the Merits is Granted. The Brief is considered filed as of September 5, 2014.
|
|
| 09/05/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Stacey Miller and Randy Miller.
|
|
| 09/05/2014 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Left voice mail message with Mr. Minton requesting a motion for extension of time to file respondent's brief on the merits be filed before we can accept his respondent's brief on the merits (untimely filed - one day late).
|
|
| 08/20/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Response Brief is due September 4, 2014. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED. Reply Brief is due September 19, 2014.
|
|
| 08/20/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Agreed Motion for Extension of time to file Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Stacy Miller.
|
|
| 08/19/2014 | Call received | |
Call received from respondent attorney, Michael Minton, letting the Court know he will be filing an extension of time to file response brief this week.
|
|
| 08/19/2014 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Call made to respondent attorney Michael Minton regarding status of response brief due; left voicemail.
|
|
| 07/16/2014 | Brief on the Merits | |
Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Randoll Mill Pharmacy.
|
|
| 06/09/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Motion to Extension of Time to file Petitioners' Brief on the Merits is granted. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will be disfavored. Pets' Brief due July 16, 2014; Respose Brief due August 5, 2014; Pets' Reply Brief due August 20, 2014.
|
|
| 06/09/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Brief on the Merits. On behalf of Randoll Mill Pharmacy, et al.
|
|
| 05/19/2014 | Case Record Filed | |
Electronic Appellate Record received.
|
|
| 05/19/2014 | Record Requested in Case | |
Record requested from the 2nd COA
|
|
| 05/16/2014 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Briefing on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief due no later than 6/16/14; Response brief due 7/7/14; Reply brief due 7/22/14.
|
|
| 05/15/2014 | Motion for leave to file brief | |
Motion to Leave to file Sur-Reply filed on behalf of Stacey and Randy Miller.
|
|
| 05/15/2014 | Surreply filed | |
Respondents, Stacey and Randy Miller, Sur-Reply to Petitioner's Reply to Petition.
|
|
| 04/29/2014 | Reply to Response | |
Reply to Petition filed on behalf of Randoll Mill Pharmacy.
|
|
| 04/10/2014 | MET to file reply disposed of | Filing granted |
Reply due 04/29/14.
|
|
| 04/10/2014 | Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed | |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Randoll Mill Pharmacy, et al.
|
|
| 03/31/2014 | Response to Petition | |
Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Stacey Miller, et al.
|
|
| 03/20/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposed | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Response is due March 31, 2014. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
|
|
| 03/20/2014 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Response filed on behalf of Stacey Miller.
|
|
| 02/21/2014 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for review due no later than 3/24/14.
|
|
| 02/19/2014 | Response to Motion filed | |
Amicus Curiae Texas Pharmacy Association’s Response to Respondents Stacey & Randy Miller's Motion to Strike or Return Amicus Curiae Brief
|
|
| 02/18/2014 | Call received | |
Attorney Keene will be e-filing a response to the motion to strike as soon as possible.
|
|
| 02/14/2014 | Motion to Strike filed | |
Respondents’ Motion to Strike or Return Amicus Curiae Brief of Texas Pharmacy Association. On behalf of Stacey Miller and Randy Miller.
|
|
| 02/12/2014 | Amicus Curiae Brief received | |
Brief of Amicus Curiae filed on behalf of Alliance of Independent Pharmacists - Texas, et al.
|
|
| 02/10/2014 | Amicus Curiae Brief received | |
Amicus Brief of Texas Pharmacy Association. Submitted by Mark A. Keene, KEENE & SEIBERT, P.C. , 2700 Bee Cave Road, Suite 120 , Austin, Texas 78746 , Telephone: (512) 343-6248.
|
|
| 01/21/2014 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 01/17/2014 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response Waiver and Designation of Michael W. Minton as lead counsel filed on behalf of Stacey and Randy Miller.
|
|
| 01/06/2014 | Amicus Curiae Brief received | |
Brief of Amicus Curiae of Southwest Pharmacy Solutions d/b/a American Pharmacies in Support of the Petitioners, submitted by Mr. Miguel S. Rodriguez, Taylor Dunham LLP, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1050, Austin, TX 78701, Phone (512) 473-2257, Fax (512) 478-4409. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 12/27/2013 | Call received | |
Spoke with Erin Lunceford and she will resubmit the corrected petition for review on Monday morning.
|
|
| 12/27/2013 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
Left message with Erin Lunceford. We received two courtesy copies of the petition for review, along with $145 check. The petition for review is still rejected because the appendix did not contain the trial court judgment and court of appeals judgment. Asked her efile and resubmit the corrected petition for review along with the filing fee.
|
|
| 12/20/2013 | Petition for Review | |
Petition for Review filed on behalf of Randoll Mill Pharmacy, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|