Supreme Court

Case: 14-0133    
14-0133
02/20/2014
Petition for Review under Tex. R. App. P. 53.1
CATHERINE STOUFFER, ET AL. 
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
06/26/2014Brief on the MeritsPetitioner Petitioners' Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer, et al.
03/18/2014Reply to ResponsePetitioner Reply to Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer, et al.
03/03/2014Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company.
02/20/2014Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer.  MOTION TO WITHDRAW INCORPORATED.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
08/12/2014Case Stored  e-stored
08/12/2014Notice sent to Court of Appeals 
08/01/2014Petition for Review disposedDismissed
08/01/2014Motion to dismiss disposedFiling granted Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review granted
07/23/2014Motion to dismiss  Unopposed Motion to Withdraw and Dismiss Petition for Review filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer, et al.
07/17/2014Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Respondent's Brief on the Mertis is Granted. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored. Respondent's brief is due August 6, 2014; and Reply brief is due August 21, 2014.
07/16/2014Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Respondent's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company.
06/26/2014Brief on the Merits  Petitioners' Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer, et al.
06/18/2014Case Record Filed   Electronic Appellate Record received.
06/09/2014Motion for Extension of Time disposed.Filing granted Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Brief on the Merits is Granted. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored. Petitioner's brief is due June 26, 2014; Respondent's brief is due July 16, 2014; and Reply brief is due July 31, 2014.
06/09/2014Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer, et al.
05/19/2014Record Requested in Case  Record requested from the 5th COA
05/16/2014Brief on the Merits Ordered  Briefing on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief due no later than 6/16/14; Response brief due 7/7/14; Reply brief due 7/22/14.
05/15/2014Miscellaneous motion disposed. See Remarks.Denied Motion for Recall of Mandate denied
03/25/2014Case forwarded to Court 
03/18/2014Reply to Response  Reply to Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer, et al.
03/13/2014Pro hac vice motion disposedFiling granted Motion in Support of Motion for Christian D. Searcy to appear Pro Hac Vice granted.
03/13/2014Pro hac vice motion disposedFiling granted Motion for Christian D. Searcy to appear Pro Hac Vice granted.
03/13/2014Pro hac vice motion disposedFiling granted Motion in Support of Motion for Jack P. Hill to appear Pro Hac Vice granted.  
03/13/2014Pro hac vice motion disposedFiling granted Motion for Jack P. Hill to appear Pro Hac Vice granted.
03/12/2014Pro hac vice motion filed  Texas attorney, Dicky Grigg's Motion in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Christian D. Searcy.
03/12/2014Pro hac vice motion filed  Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed of Christian D. Searcy.
03/11/2014Pro hac vice motion filed  Texas attorney, Dicky Grigg's Motion in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jack P. Hill.
03/11/2014Pro hac vice motion filed  Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jack P. Hill.
03/03/2014Response to Motion filed  Response to Motion for Recall of Mandate filed on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company.
03/03/2014Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company.
02/24/2014Call received  Call from respondent's attorney stating that the Motion for Recall of Mandate is opposed and they will be expecting to file a response to the motion by 3/3/14.
02/21/2014Phone call from Clerk's Office  Requested four motions for pro hac vice for Mr. Searcy and Mr. Hill.
02/21/2014Phone call from Clerk's Office  Requested $10.00 fee for Motion to Recall Mandate from petitioner attorney.
02/20/2014Motion to withdraw mandate  Opposed Motion to Recall Mandate filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer.
02/20/2014Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Catherine Stouffer.  MOTION TO WITHDRAW INCORPORATED.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
08/12/2014Case StoredCase stored.e-stored
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Boivin, AngelaPetitionerMr. Jeremy Martin
Mr. Zachary Lynn Boyd  
Mr. Stephen F. Malouf
Mr. Jonathan Andrew Nockels
Mr. Peter Giles Malouf
Ms. Sarah Shulkin  
Stouffer, CatherinePetitionerMs. Charla G. Aldous
Mr. Jeffrey S. Levinger
Mr. Brent R. Walker
Union Pacific Railroad CompanyRespondentMs. Sheryl Sipes Norman
Ms. Karen R. Dow
Mr. Kent G. Rutter
Ms. Christina F. Crozier
Ms. Nina Cortell
Mr. Mainess Gibson
Mr. John W. Proctor
Lubbers, TiffaniePetitionerMr. Richard Alan 'Dicky' Grigg
Mr. Broadus A. Spivey
Boivin, LeoncePetitionerMr. Ronald Dean Gresham  
Mr. James L. Mitchell
Court of Appeals Information:
Reverse & Remand 
420 SW3d 233, 12-19-13 
5th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Kerry P. FitzGerald 
Trial Court Information
116th District Court 
Dallas 
Honorable Tonya Parker 
DC-12-15024-F