| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/16/2016 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Brief on the merits requested: Relator's brief due no later than January 17, 2017; Response brief due February 6, 2017; Reply brief due February 21, 2017.
|
|
| 12/07/2016 | Reply to Response | |
Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of Xerox Corporation, et al.
|
|
| 12/06/2017 | Submission Schedule | |
Submission Schedule for December 6, 2017.
|
|
| 12/06/2017 | Oral argument | |
Argued on behalf of relators by David M. Gunn; Argued on behalf of real party in interest by J. Campbell Barker
|
|
| 12/05/2017 | Exhibits in case/cause filed | |
Oral Argument Bench Book filed on behalf of Xerox Corp., et al.
|
|
| 12/05/2017 | Exhibits in case/cause filed | |
Oral Argument Exhibits filed on behalf of the State of Texas.
|
|
| 11/29/2017 | Amicus Curiae Brief received | |
Amicus Brief of The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America submitted by William R. Peterson of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP of Houston, Texas.
|
|
| 11/08/2017 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | |
Oral Argument Submission Form submitted on behalf of relators, Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC. Oral Argument will be presented by David M. Gunn of Beck Redden LLP of Houston, Texas.
|
|
| 11/07/2016 | Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed | |
Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of State of Texas.
|
|
| 11/06/2017 | Oral Argument Submission Form from Attorney received | |
Oral Argument Submission Form submitted on behalf of real party in interest, the State of Texas. Oral Argument will be presented by J. Campbell Barker of the Texas Attorney General's Office of Austin, Texas.
|
|
| 10/12/2018 | Certified cys of cost bill sent to attys of record | |
Cost Bill Issued
|
|
| 10/07/2016 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for writ of mandamus due no later than November 7, 2016.
|
|
| 09/26/2018 | Letter Filed | |
Notice stating that Kyle Hawkins is recused from this case and John Campbell Barker represents the State of Texas.
|
|
| 09/11/2018 | Letter Filed | |
Letter stating Scott Keller is no longer Solicitor General.
|
|
| 09/06/2016 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 09/01/2017 | Case set for oral argument | Case set for oral argument |
This case has been set for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., December 6, 2017. Time allotted to argue: 20/20 minutes
|
|
| 09/01/2017 | Mandamus Set to Argue | |
|
|
| 09/01/2017 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposed | Case set for oral argument |
|
|
| 08/31/2016 | Case Record Filed | |
Mandamus Record Vol. I-III filed on behalf of Xerox Corporation, et al.
|
|
| 08/31/2016 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed | |
Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of Xerox Corporation and Xerox State healthcare, LLC f/k/a ACS State Healthcare, LLC.
|
|
| 08/07/2018 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposed | Filing granted |
Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Motion for Rehearing has been granted. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE CONSIDERED. Motion for Rehearing is due on September 7, 2018.
|
|
| 08/07/2018 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing | |
Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Xerox Corp., et al.
|
|
| 07/09/2018 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposed | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time to file Motion for Rehearing has been granted. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED. Motion for Rehearing is due on August 8, 2018.
|
|
| 07/09/2018 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing | |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Motion for Rehearing filed on behalf of Xerox Corporation, et al.
|
|
| 07/05/2017 | Reply Brief | |
Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Xerox Coporation, et al.
|
|
| 06/22/2018 | Opinion issued | Denied |
The Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus. Justice Guzman delivered the opinion of the Court. (Justice Boyd and Justice Blacklock not sitting)
(6/22/2018 11:15:23 AM) 160671.pdf
|
|
| 06/06/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply Brief on the Merits granted. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will be disfavored. Reply Brief is due July 5, 2017.
|
|
| 06/05/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Xerox Corporation, et al.
|
|
| 05/19/2017 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus reinstated | |
|
|
| 05/19/2017 | Abatement Order Lifted | |
Abatement order issued May 2, 2017 is lifted and the petition for writ of mandamus is reinstated.
|
|
| 05/10/2017 | Status report filed | |
Status Report filed on behalf of State of Texas.
|
|
| 05/02/2017 | Order of the Court Issued | Matter in Supreme Court of Texas Abated |
The case is abated under Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b) until further order of this Court.
|
|
| 05/02/2017 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposed | Matter in Supreme Court of Texas Abated |
The case is abated under Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b) until further order of this Court.
|
|
| 05/02/2017 | Call received | |
The Clerk spoke with Connie Pfeiffer, counsel for the relator, about whether the trial court judge may waive abatement of the case in order to allow successor judge to reconsider the original decision. The Clerk stated that he previously spoke with Jody Hughes, counsel for real party in interest, and informed Mr. Hughes that under Rule 7.2 the successor judge must reconsider the order and may not waive reconsideration. The Clerk stated that an abatement order would issue.
|
|
| 04/21/2017 | Brief on the Merits | |
Response Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of the State of Texas.
|
|
| 04/21/2017 | Notice received | |
Pursuant TRAP 7.2(a), Notice regarding Automatic Substitution of the Respondent in this original proceeding filed on behalf of State of Texas. Judge Yelonosky has now retired. The judge handling the case in trial court is now the Honorable Sulak.
|
|
| 03/28/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Real Party in Interest's Brief on the Merits is granted. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED. Real Party in Interest's brief is due April 21, 2017; Reply brief is due May 8, 2017.
|
|
| 03/28/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Real Party in Interest's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of the State of Texas.
|
|
| 02/22/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Real Party in Interest's Brief on the Merits is granted. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored. Real Party in Interest's brief is due April 7, 2017; and Reply brief is due April 24, 2017.
|
|
| 02/21/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Real Party in Interest's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of The State of Texas.
|
|
| 02/16/2017 | Brief on the Merits | |
Relators' Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Xerox Corp., et al.
|
|
| 01/17/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Relator's Brief on the Merits is granted. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED. Relator's brief is due February 16, 2017; Real party's brief is due March 8, 2017; Reply brief is due March 23, 2017.
|
|
| 01/17/2017 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Relator's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of Xerox Corporation, et al.
|
|