Supreme Court

Case: 18-0715    
18-0715
08/06/2018
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
AIC MANAGEMENT COMPANY 
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC AND REDDY GREENSBROOK, LTD., ARETE REAL ESTATE & DEVELOPMENT, AND MUDUGANTI REDDY 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
10/19/2018Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC.
09/19/2018Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of AIC Management Company.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
11/30/2018Petition for Review disposedDenied
10/23/2018Case forwarded to Court 
10/19/2018Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC.
09/19/2018Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of AIC Management Company.
08/20/2018Call received  Call received from Mr. Ramesh Kapur regarding his motion for extension of time.
08/20/2018Motion to strike disposedDenied Motion to Strike Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time has been denied. This is not a determination on the issue of whether petitioner requires counsel to represent AIC Management Company
08/20/2018Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review has been granted. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED. Petition for Review is due on September 19, 2018.
08/20/2018Motion to Strike filed  Motion to Strike Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC.
08/20/2018Electronic communication sent to Party  Emailed counsel for respondents to determine if the motion is opposed.
08/17/2018Redrafted motion for extension of time filed  Redrafted Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of AIC Management Company.
08/09/2018Call received  Mr. Kapur will refile his motion for extension of time per the Clerk's office request.
08/09/2018Electronic communication sent to Party  Email sent to all counsel regarding the resubmission of the motion for extension of time.
08/09/2018Call received  Call received from Mr. Ramesh Kapur, who is filing on behalf of sole proprietorship AIC Managment Company. Because AIC Mgmt. Co. is a sole proprietorship, Mr. Kapur asserts he should be permitted to file on behalf of AIC.
08/09/2018Phone call from Clerk's Office  Left voicemail for Mr. Ramesh Kapur asking him to resubmit the Motion for Extension of Time and pay the filing fee.
08/06/2018Phone call from Clerk's Office  Attempted to reach Ramesh Kapur at number provided but was unable to connect.
08/06/2018Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiled document is struck by the Court Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review violates Texas Government Code § 81.102 and is struck. The redrafted motion is due to be filed on or before August 20, 2018.
08/06/2018Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  STRUCK | Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of AIC Management Company.
08/06/2018Court reporter/recorder's record 
08/06/2018Clerk's Record 
01/10/2019Notice sent to Court of Appeals 
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
01/10/2019Case StoredCase stored.e-stored
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Muduganti Redi RespondentMr. J. Marcus Hill
Kapur, Ramesh Other interested party Mr. Ramesh Kapur
AT&T Mobility, LLC RespondentMr. Richard A. Howell  
Arete Real Estate & Development CompanyRespondentMr. J. Marcus Hill
Mr. Jonathan Stoger
AIC Management CompanyPetitionerMs. Tracy J. Willi
Mr. Robert G. Bailey
Court of Appeals Information:
Aff/Pt and Rev & Ren/Pt 
___ SW3d ___, 03-08-18 
1st Court of Appeals 
Honorable Sherry Radack 
Trial Court Information
129th District Court 
Harris 
Honorable Michael Paul Gomez 
2011-42761