Supreme Court

Case: 18-1043    
18-1043
10/31/2018
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
STACEY R. HAMMER 
RICHARD HAMMER 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
04/04/2019Reply to ResponsePetitioner Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Stacey R. Hammer.
03/27/2019Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Richard Hammer.
12/17/2018Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of Stacey R. Hammer.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
12/27/2018Case forwarded to Court 
12/18/2018Response Waiver filed  Response Waiver filed on behalf of Richard Hammer.
12/17/2018Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Stacey R. Hammer.
12/03/2018Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review has been granted. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED. Petition for Review is due on December 17, 2018.
12/03/2018Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Stacey R. Hammer.
12/03/2018Call received  Petitioner will be filing a second unopposed motion for extension of time to file petition for review no later than today.
10/31/2018Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review granted. Petition for Review is due December 3, 2018.
10/31/2018Electronic communication received from Party  Email received from counsel for respondent stating they are not opposed to motion for extension of time and therefore will not be filing a response.
10/31/2018Electronic communication sent to Party  Email sent to counsel for Respondent to determine if a response to the motion for extension of time to file petition for review will be filed.
10/31/2018Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Stacey R. Hammer.
10/31/2018Court reporter/recorder's record 
10/31/2018Court reporter/recorder's record 
10/31/2018Clerk's Record 
07/26/2019Notice sent to Court of Appeals 
06/14/2019Petition for Review disposedDenied
05/14/2019Motion to substitute disposedFiling granted Motion to Substitute has been granted.
05/14/2019Motion to Substitute filed  Unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Richard Hammer.
04/04/2019Reply to Response  Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Stacey R. Hammer.
03/27/2019Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Richard Hammer.
02/20/2019Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposedFiling granted Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Richard Hammer. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED. Requested response is due March 27, 2019.
02/20/2019Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Richard Hammer.
01/25/2019Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Requested response to petition for review due no later than February 25, 2019.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
07/26/2019Case StoredCase stored.e-stored
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Hammer, Stacey R.PetitionerMr. Mark Joseph Barrera
Hammer, RichardRespondentMr. John Christopher Nickelson
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed  
___ SW3d ___, 09-18-18 
3rd Court of Appeals 
Honorable Melissa Young Goodwin 
Trial Court Information
419th District Court 
Travis 
Honorable Timothy M. Sulak 
D-1-FM-17-005035