| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/05/2019 | Case Stored | |
e-stored
|
|
| 10/25/2019 | Opinion issued | Dismissed without prejudice. |
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court dismisses the writ of mandamus without prejudice.
(10/25/2019 3:48:08 PM) 190671.pdf
|
|
| 10/25/2019 | Mandamus granted pursuant to TRAP 52.8 | |
|
|
| 10/25/2019 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus disposed | Petition granted pursuant to TRAP 52.8(c) |
|
|
| 08/23/2019 | Reply to Petition for Writ of Mandamus | |
Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC.
|
|
| 08/19/2019 | Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Filed | |
Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of Nueces County, et al.
|
|
| 08/14/2019 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposed | Denied |
Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Requested Response denied. The requested response remains due no later than 4:00 p.m. on August 19, 2019.
|
|
| 08/13/2019 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of Nueces County, et al.
|
|
| 08/13/2019 | Amicus Curiae Letter Received | |
Amicus Curiae Letter of voestalpine Texas LLC. Submitted by Rosemarie Kanusky of Norton Rose Fulbright, of San Antonio, Texas.
|
|
| 08/09/2019 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for writ of mandamus due no later than 4:00 p.m., August 19, 2019.
|
|
| 08/05/2019 | Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed | |
Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on behalf of Corpus Christi Liquefaction, LLC.
|
|