Supreme Court

Case: 21-0951    
21-0951
11/04/2021
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
FEE, SMITH, SHARP & VITULLO, LLP, JOHN L. MALESOVAS, D/B/A MALESOVAS LAW FIRM AND ANTHONY VITULLO 
DEANA STRUNK AND CECIL WEBER ("SCOTT") CASTERLINE III 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
02/28/2022Reply to Response  Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, et al.
01/28/2022Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Deana Strunk.
12/15/2021Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, et al.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
04/07/2022Notice sent to Court of Appeals 
03/04/2022Petition for Review disposedDenied
03/02/2022Notice from attorney regarding vacation dates  Vacation Notice Letter filed on behalf of John L. Malesovas.
02/28/2022Reply to Response  Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, et al.
02/08/2022MET to file reply disposed ofFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply in Support of Petition for Review is granted. Reply is due February 28, 2022. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
02/08/2022Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, et al.
02/01/2022Case forwarded to Court 
01/28/2022Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Deana Strunk.
12/20/2021Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposedFiling granted Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review is granted. Response to Petition for Review is due January 28, 2022. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED.
12/20/2021Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Deana Strunk.
12/15/2021Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, et al.
11/05/2021Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review is granted. Petition for Review is due December 15, 2021.
11/04/2021Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, et al.
11/04/2021Clerk's Record 
11/04/2021Clerk's Record 
11/04/2021Court reporter/recorder's record 
11/04/2021Clerk's Record 
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
04/07/2022Case StoredCase stored.e-stored
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Fee, Smith, Sharp & Vitullo, LLP, et al.PetitionerMr. Wade Crosnoe
Stephanie Cook
Mr. Thomas A. Culpepper
John L. Malesovas d/b/a Malesovas Law FirmPetitionerMs. Lindsey K. Wyrick
Mr. Daniel D. Tostrud
Ms. Katherine K. Elrich
Mr. Matthew E. Last
Deana Strunk, et al.RespondentMr. Steven Hall Stodghill
Mr. Robin Clay Hoblit
Dylan French
Mr. Stephen F. Malouf
John Michael Gaddis
Rex Mann
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed  
___ SW3d ___, 09-30-21 
5th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Robbie Partida-Kipness 
Trial Court Information
162nd District Court 
Dallas 
Honorable Maricela Breedlove 
DC-20-05323