Supreme Court

Case: 22-0663    
22-0663
08/09/2022
Multidistrict Litigation
IN RE MAXIM CRANE MVA LITIGATION 
 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
08/29/2022MDL Response to Motion for TransferRespondent Plaintiffs' Combined Response to Defendants' First Amended Motion for Transfer to MDL Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of all Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of David Alas, Joel Chavez, Wilmer Fajardo, Noe Lopez and Leonel Ramirez by attorney Daniel Johnson
08/11/2022Amendment to Multidistrict Litigation filingMovant Defendants' First Amended Motion for Transfer to MDL Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings filed by Kevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. by attorney Kent Adams
08/09/2022Multidistrcit Litigation Motion to TransferMovant Defendants Motion for Transfer to a Multidistrict Litigation Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of all Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of Kevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. by attorney Kent Adams
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
10/17/2022Motion before the MDL Panel disposedDenied Order Issued stating: "The Multidistrict Litigation Panel reviewed Defendants’ motion, filed October 11, 2022, to reconsider the amended motion to transfer.  The Motion for Reconsideration is hereby denied."
(10/17/2022 1:25:05 PM) 22-0663 MDL Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration 10-17-22.pdf
10/11/2022Multidistrict Litigation Motion  Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of Their Amended Motion to Transfer to a Multidistrict Litigation Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of Kevin Daniel Cichoracki, et al. by attorney Dani Sanders
09/29/2022Multidistrict Litigation Motion to Transfer disposedDenied Order issued stating: "After due consideration of the motion to transfer, the response, and the applicable law, we deny the motion to transfer. We conclude that the movants failed to demonstrate that a transfer to an MDL pretrial court would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the actions. Id. The motion to transfer and the motion for stay are denied.
(9/29/2022 3:05:28 PM) 22-0663 MDL Order Denying Transfer 09-29-22.pdf
09/29/2022MDL Motion to Stay disposedDenied Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings denied
08/29/2022MDL Response to Motion for Transfer  Plaintiffs' Combined Response to Defendants' First Amended Motion for Transfer to MDL Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of all Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of David Alas, Joel Chavez, Wilmer Fajardo, Noe Lopez and Leonel Ramirez by attorney Daniel Johnson
08/11/2022Amendment to Multidistrict Litigation filing  Defendants' First Amended Motion for Transfer to MDL Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings filed by Kevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. by attorney Kent Adams
08/10/2022Motion to Stay filed before the MDL Panel  Request for Stay of All Trial Court Proceedings (incorporated within the Motion to Transfer) filed on behalf of DefendantsKevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. filed by attorney Kent Adams
08/09/2022Multidistrcit Litigation Motion to Transfer  Defendants Motion for Transfer to a Multidistrict Litigation Pretrial Court and Request for Stay of all Trial Court Proceedings filed on behalf of Kevin Daniel Cichoracki and Maxim Crane Works, L.P. by attorney Kent Adams
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
No Calendar.
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Maxim Crane Works, L.P.MovantMr. Kent M. Adams
Alas, DavidRespondentMr. John Daniel Johnson
Cichoracki, Kevin DanielMovantMr. Kent M. Adams
Court of Appeals Information:
 
 
 
 
Trial Court Information