| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/15/2023 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Requested response to petition for review due no later than January 16, 2024.
|
|
| 11/14/2023 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record | |
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Clerk's Record | |
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record | |
SEALED DOCUMENTS
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record | |
SEALED DOCUMENTS
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record | |
SEALED DOCUMENTS
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record | |
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record | |
|
|
| 10/16/2023 | Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record | |
|
|
| 10/13/2023 | Petition for Review | |
Petition for Review filed on behalf of Floyd Kenneth Bailer, Jr., et al.
|
|
| 07/29/2024 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
|
|
| 07/24/2024 | Call received | |
Call received from Petitioner regarding case status.
|
|
| 06/14/2024 | Petition for Review disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 05/09/2024 | Reply to Response | |
Reply to Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Floyd Kenneth Bailey, Jr., et al.
|
|
| 04/26/2024 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposed | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review is granted. Response was timely filed April 24, 2024.
|
|
| 04/24/2024 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Adam Peavy, et al.
|
|
| 04/24/2024 | Response to Petition | |
Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Adam Peavy, et al.
|
|
| 04/10/2024 | Electronic communication sent to Party | |
Email sent to respondent attorney stating: "This is the Supreme Court of Texas second attempt to inquire about the requested response to the petition for review that was filed in case no. 23-0859, Bailey v. Peavy, et al. Our records indicate you are the attorney of record for the respondent, Adam Peavy and Adam Peavy PC. The requested response was due on January 16, 2024 but has not been efiled at this time. The Court asked that I follow up with you to find out when we can expect a motion for extension of time and the requested response."
|
|
| 02/29/2024 | Call received | |
Call from counsel for petitioner inquiring if the court has received a response to email sent to counsel for respondent. No response to email has been received.
|
|
| 02/13/2024 | Electronic communication sent to Party | |
Email sent to respondent attorney, Mr. Daughtry stating: "The Supreme Court of Texas requested a response to the petition for review that was filed in case no. 23-0859, Bailey v. Peavy, et al. Our records indicate you are the attorney of record for the respondent, Adam Peavy and Adam Peavy PC. The requested response was due on January 16, 2024 but has not been efiled at this time. The Court asked that I follow up with you to find out when we can expect a motion for extension of time and the requested response."
|
|