Supreme Court

Case: 24-0206    
24-0206
03/18/2024
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
MEGATEL C90-2, INC., ARMIN AFZALIPOUR, AND MEGATEL HOMES, LLC F/K/A MEGATEL HOMES, INC. 
BANK OF UTAH 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
02/14/2025Supplemental Brief filedPetitioner Supplemental Letter Brief filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
01/02/2025Reply to Response to Petition filed Petitioner Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C-90, Inc., et al.
10/14/2024Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Bank of Utah.
06/21/2024Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
11/25/2024MET to file reply disposed ofFiling granted Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply in support of Petition for Review is granted. Reply is due January 2, 2025. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will not be considered.
11/25/2024Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed  Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply in support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
10/24/2024MET to file reply disposed ofFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply in Support of Petition for Review is granted. Reply is due December 2, 2024. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will be disfavored.
10/24/2024Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
10/14/2024Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Bank of Utah.
10/03/2024Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposedFiling granted Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review is granted. Response is due October 14, 2024. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will not be considered.
10/02/2024Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Bank of Utah.
08/28/2024Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposedFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review is granted. Response is due October 3, 2024. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will be disfavored.
08/27/2024Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Bank of Utah.
08/02/2024Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response  Response requested to Petition for Review due no later than September 3, 2024.
07/02/2024Case forwarded to Court 
06/26/2024Response Waiver filed  Response Waiver filed on behalf of Bank of Utah.
06/21/2024Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
06/06/2025Mandate issued  Mandate and Cost Bill Issued
06/06/2025Call received  Call from counsel inquiring when mandate will issue.
05/16/2025Court approved judgment sent to attorneys of recordIssued
05/16/2025Concurring Opinion issued.Issued Justice Sullivan filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Busby joined.
05/16/2025Petition for Review disposedPetition granted motion under TRAP 56.3 Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 56.3, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument or considering the merits, the Court vacates the trial court’s and the court of appeals’ judgments and remands the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.  The Court denies the parties’ request to vacate the court of appeals’ opinion.
(5/16/2025 9:43:08 AM) 240206c.pdf, 24-0206.jmt.pdf
05/16/2025Motion to dismiss disposedFiling granted in part Joint Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Settlement granted in part
05/15/2024Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Third Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review granted. No further extensions of time will be considered. Petition for Review is due no later than June 24, 2024.
05/14/2024Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Third Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
04/18/2024Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review granted. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored. Petition for Review is due no later than May 24, 2024.
04/17/2024Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Second Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
04/10/2025Call received  Call from counsel regarding status of motion to dismiss.
03/18/2024Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review is granted. Petition for Review is due April 24, 2024.
03/18/2024Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
03/18/2024Clerk's Record 
03/18/2024Court reporter/recorder's record 
03/18/2024Court reporter/recorder's record 
03/18/2024Clerk's Record 
03/18/2024Clerk's Record 
03/17/2025Call received  Call received from counsel regarding status of motion to dismiss.
02/25/2025Call received  Call received from counsel for Petitioner regarding status of motion to dismiss.
02/14/2025Supplemental Brief filed  Supplemental Letter Brief filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
02/11/2025Brief on the Merits Ordered  Supplemental Briefing requested: "The Court requests that the parties file, by February 21, 2025, supplemental briefing regarding their request to vacate the court of appeals’ opinion."
01/24/2025Motion to dismiss  Joint Motion to Dismiss filed on behalf of Megatel C90-2, Inc., et al.
01/02/2025Reply to Response to Petition filed   Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Megatel C-90, Inc., et al.
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
06/06/2025Case StoredCase stored.e-stored
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Bank of UtahRespondentMr. Perrin Fourmy
Mr. Jeffrey Scott Lowenstein
Ms. Beverly A. Whitley
Ms. Olivia Stedman
Megatel C90-2, Inc, et al. PetitionerMs. Kelli Bills  
Ms. Anne Johnson
Ms. Megan Coker
Court of Appeals Information:
Aff-Mod/Pt,Rev & Rem/Pt  
___ SW3d ___, 02-07-24 
5th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Maricela Breedlove 
Trial Court Information
14th District Court 
Dallas 
Honorable Eric Moye 
DC-19-11277