Supreme Court

Case: 25-0911    
25-0911
10/09/2025
Petition for Review originally filed as 53.7(f)
GUILLERMO ACOSTA AND JOSE MOLINA 
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND RASIER, LLC 
Appellate Briefs
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Description▲▼RemarksDocument
03/09/2026Reply to ResponsePetitioner Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Guillermo Acosta, et al.
02/19/2026Response to PetitionRespondent Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc., et al.
11/10/2025Petition for ReviewPetitioner Petition for Review filed on behalf of Guillermo Acosta, et al.
Case Events
Date▲▼Event Type▲▼Disposition▲▼RemarksDocument
05/08/2026Notice sent to Court of Appeals 
03/27/2026Petition for Review disposedDenied
03/09/2026Reply to Response  Reply in Support of Petition for Review filed on behalf of Guillermo Acosta, et al.
02/19/2026Response to Petition  Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc., et al.
01/16/2026Motion for Extension of Time to File Response disposedFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review is granted. Petition for Review is due February 19, 2026. Further requests for extensions of time for this filing will be disfavored.
01/15/2026Motion for Extension of Time to File Response  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
12/19/2025Supreme Court of Texas Ordered Response  Court ordered response to petition for review due no later than January 20, 2026.
11/18/2025Case forwarded to Court 
11/12/2025Response Waiver filed  Response Waiver filed on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc, et al.
11/10/2025Petition for Review  Petition for Review filed on behalf of Guillermo Acosta, et al.
10/09/2025Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review disposedFiling granted Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review is granted. Petition for Review is due November 10, 2025.
10/09/2025Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review filed  Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review filed on behalf of Guillermo Acosta, et al.
10/09/2025Court reporter/recorder's record 
10/09/2025Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record 
10/09/2025Clerk's Record 
10/09/2025Clerk's Record 
10/09/2025Clerk's Record 
10/09/2025Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record 
10/09/2025Supplement to Clerk's/Reporter's Record 
Calendars
Set Date▲▼Calendar Type▲▼Reason Set▲▼Remarks▲▼
05/08/2026Case StoredCase stored.e-stored
Parties
Party▲▼Party Type▲▼Representative▲▼
Rasier, LLCRespondentMs. Heidi Jean Gumienny
Ms. Anne Doda
Ms. Kristie Marie Escudi Johnson
Mr. Jarad Kent  
Mr. Michael J. Adams-Hurta
Ms. Jessica Z. Barger
Inman, BrianReal Party in Interest Harry Church
Mr. Larry J. Goldman
Uber Technologies Inc.RespondentMs. Heidi Jean Gumienny
Ms. Jessica Z. Barger
Ms. Anne Doda
Mr. Jarad Kent  
Mr. Michael J. Adams-Hurta
Ms. Kristie Marie Escudi Johnson
Molina, JosePetitionerMr. Charles Orr
Mr. Oscar A. Lara
Mr. James Scherr
Acosta, GuillermoPetitionerMr. Oscar A. Lara
Mr. Charles Orr
Mr. James Scherr
Court of Appeals Information:
Affirmed  
___ SW3d ___, 07-01-25 
8th Court of Appeals 
Honorable Lisa J. Soto 
Trial Court Information
261st District Court 
Travis 
Honorable Laurie Rayson Eiserloh 
D-1-GN-24-001726