| Date▲▼ | Event Type▲▼ | Disposition▲▼ | Remarks | Document |
| 12/23/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed motion to extend time to file Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits granted. Reply Brief is due January 10, 2012. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THIS FILING WILL BE DISFAVORED
|
|
| 12/22/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
E-FILED Unopposed motion to extend time to file Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits. On behalf of Brookshire Katy Drainage District.
|
|
| 12/09/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
E-FILED Respondent's Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of The Lily Gardens, LLC. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 11/18/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Motion for Extension of Time granted. Respondent's Brief is due December 9, 2011. Reply Brief is due December 27, 2011.
|
|
| 11/10/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
E-FILED Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief on the Merits filed on behalf of The Lily Gardens, LLC.
|
|
| 10/12/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Opposed Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to file Petition for Review is granted. Respondent's Brief on the Merits is due November 9, 2011; Reply Brief on the Merits is due November 28, 2011. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE DISFAVORED.
|
|
| 10/12/2011 | Amicus Curiae Brief received | |
E-FILED Brief of Amicus Curiae Brookshire Municipal Water District. Submitted by Ross J. Radcliffe of law firm JOHNSON RADCLIFFE PETROV & BOBBITT PLLC, 1001 McKinney Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002, (713) 237-1221. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 10/07/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed | |
E-FILED Opposed Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on the Merits. On behalf of The Lily Gardens, LLC., et al.
|
|
| 09/19/2011 | Brief on the Merits | |
E-FILED Petitioner Brookshire Katy Drainage District's Brief on the Merits. HARD COPIES RECEIVED.
|
|
| 08/29/2011 | Case Record Filed | |
Record inventory in main remarks.
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Correction filed (See Remarks) | |
E-FILED (CORRECTION - IMPROPER SCANNING OF ORIGINAL VERSION) Amicus Curiae Texas Water Conservation Association's Brief In Support Of Petition for Review. Submitted by Jose de la Fuente; LLOYD GOSSELINK ROCHELLE & TOWNSEND PC, 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900, Austin, Texas 78701, [512] 322-5800. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 08/26/2011 | Amicus Curiae Brief received | |
E-FILED Amicus Curiae Texas Water Conservation Association's Brief In Support Of Petition for Review. Submitted by Jose de la Fuente; LLOYD GOSSELINK ROCHELLE & TOWNSEND PC, 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900, Austin, Texas 78701, [512] 322-5800. HARD COPIES OF CORRECTED ELECTRONIC COPY REC'D
|
|
| 08/22/2011 | Record Requested in Case | |
|
|
| 08/19/2011 | Brief on the Merits Ordered | |
Brief on the merits requested: Petitioner's brief due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 9/19/11; Response brief due 10/10/11; Reply brief due 10/25/11; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 08/09/2011 | Phone call from Clerk's Office | |
to Mr. Kevin D. Jewell, and I spoke with his assistant. I explained her that the electronic copy of Reply that was sent to the scebriefs inbox it is not an e-filing. Also, I told her that she can either e-file today or send us the additional copies.
|
|
| 08/09/2011 | Reply to Response | |
E-FILED Reply to Response to Petition for Review filed on behalf of Brookshire Katy Drainage District. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 07/13/2011 | Response to Petition | |
E-FILED Response to petition filed on behalf of The Lily Gardens, et al. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 06/09/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time disposed. | Filing granted |
Unopposed motion for extension of time to file response granted. Response due no later than 3:00 p.m. on 7/13/11; mailbox rule does not apply. Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.
|
|
| 06/09/2011 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Response | |
E-FILED Unopposed motion for extension of time to file response filed on behalf of the Lily Gardens, LLC, et al. (HARD COPIES RECEIVED)
|
|
| 05/12/2011 | Supreme Court of Texas Requested Response | |
Response request to Petition for Review due no later than 3 p.m. on June 13, 2011; mailbox rule does not apply
|
|
| 04/23/2012 | Case Stored | |
Row 20 E-3
|
|
| 04/23/2012 | Docket Sheet from court of appeals or trial court filed | |
Docket sheet printed.
|
|
| 04/23/2012 | Notice sent to Court of Appeals | |
Certified copy of notice sent to the Court of Appeals
|
|
| 04/12/2011 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 04/06/2012 | Motion for Rehearing - Disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 04/06/2011 | Response Waiver filed | |
Response waiver to petition for review filed on behalf of The Lily Gardens, LLC, et al. (orig & 1)
|
|
| 03/31/2011 | Appendix Filed | |
appendix attached
|
|
| 03/31/2011 | Petition for Review | |
E-FILED: Petition for Review on behalf of Brookshire Katy Drainage District. (2 hard copies rec'd)
|
|
| 03/29/2012 | Amicus Curiae Letter Received | |
Amicus Curiae Letter filed on behalf of Texas Conservation Assoc'n. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|
| 03/06/2012 | Case forwarded to Court | |
|
|
| 03/01/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposed | Filing granted |
2nd Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to file Rehearing granted. Motion for Rehearing was filed in this office on February 28, 2012.
|
|
| 02/28/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing | |
E-FILED Petitioner Brookshire Katy Drainage District's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to file Rehearing.
|
|
| 02/28/2012 | Motion for Rehearing | |
E-FILED Petitioner Brookshire Katy Drainage District's Motion for Rehearing.
|
|
| 02/14/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing disposed | Filing granted |
Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to file Motion for Rehearing granted. Motion for Rehearing due no later than 2/27/12.
|
|
| 02/13/2012 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing | |
E-FILED Petitioner, Brookshire Katy Drainage District's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to file Motion for Rehearing.
|
|
| 01/27/2012 | Petition for Review disposed | Denied |
|
|
| 01/10/2012 | Reply Brief | |
E-FILED Petitioner Brookshire Katy Drainage District's Reply Brief on the Merits. (HARD COPIES REC'D)
|
|